Skip to main content
. 2018 May 31;13(5):e0197102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197102

Table 2. Results of meta-analyses of effects of mental health first aid training on outcomes.

N comparisons (k) Cohen's d [95% CI] p I2% [95% CI] Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
MHFA knowledge
Post 3 0.72 [0.59, 0.86] <.001 0 [0, 90] ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High
< = 6-month follow-up 5 0.54 [0.43, 0.64] <.001 0 [0, 79] ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High
>6-month follow-up 1 0.31 [0.09, 0.53] .006 ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderateb
Recognition of mental health problem
Post 7 0.22 [-0.17, 0.61] .276 40 [0, 75] ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b
< = 6-month follow-up 11 0.52 [0.41, 0.64] <.001 11 [0, 51] ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderatea
>6-month follow-up 1 0.22 [-0.36, 0.80] .450 ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b
Beliefs about effective treatments
Post 4 0.45 [0.11, 0.79] .010 85 [63, 94] ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderatea
< = 6-month follow-up 11 0.19 [0.07, 0.32] .002 59 [20, 79] ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderatea
Stigma
Post 8 0.14 [0.03, 0.25] .010 0 [0, 68] ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderatea
< = 6-month follow-up 14 0.14 [0.05, 0.23] .003 48 [4, 72] ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderatea
>6-month follow-up 1 0.08 [-0.14, 0.31] .473 ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b
MHFA confidence
Post 7 0.58 [0.29, 0.87] <.001 79 [57, 90] ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderatea
< = 6-month follow-up 12 0.46 [0.31, 0.62] <.001 77 [60, 87] ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,c
>6-month follow-up 2 0.21 [-0.09, 0.51] .175 28# ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b
MHFA intentions
Post 4 0.75 [0.60, 0.91] <.001 0 [0, 85] ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderatea
< = 6-month follow-up 3 0.55 [-0.08, 1.18] .085 91 [76, 96] ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b
>6-month follow-up 2 0.26 [-0.12, 0.64] .182 48# ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b
Amount of MHFA provided
Post 3 -0.06 [-0.32, 0.20] .650 0 [0, 90] ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b
< = 6-month follow-up 9 0.23 [0.08, 0.38] .002 63 [23, 82] ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderatea
>6-month follow-up 0
Quality of MHFA provided
Post 2 0.73 [-0.97, 2.43] .399 94# ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b
< = 6-month follow-up 2 -0.01 [-0.22, 0.19] .950 76# ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderateb
>6-month follow-up 1 0.25 [-0.17, 0.24] .242 ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b
MHFA trainee mental health
Post 3 -0.04 [-0.39, 0.32] .835 4 [0, 90] ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b
< = 6-month follow-up 4 0.16 [-0.03, 0.35] .093 0 [0, 85] ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b
>6-month follow-up 1 0.02 [-0.20, 0.24] .882 ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b
MHFA recipient mental health
Post 0
< = 6-month follow-up 2 0.14 [-0.05, 0.33] .144 0# ⊕⊕⊝⊝ Lowa,b
>6-month follow-up 1 -0.09 [-0.32, 0.14] .458 ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderateb

# too few studies to calculate confidence interval.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence:

High quality ⊕⊕⊕⊕: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

Moderate quality ⊕⊕⊕⊝: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

Low quality: ⊕⊕⊝⊝Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

Very low quality: ⊕⊝⊝⊝We are very uncertain about the estimate.

a Downgraded due to risk of bias.

b Downgraded due to imprecision.

c Downgraded due to publication bias.