Skip to main content
. 2018 May 31;13(5):e0198296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198296

Table 3. GLM analysis for Hb change shows model is useful (p<0.0001, R2 = 40.2%).

Source Df Sum of Squares Mean Square F value Pr>F
Model 5 119.68 23.94 24.47 <0.0001
Error 182 178.062 0.978
Corrected Total 187 297.744
R_square Coeff Var Root MSE HbChange Mean
0.402 -91.06526 0.9891 -1.08617
Source Df Type III SS Mean Square F-value Pr>F
Arm 1 0.1187 0.1187 0.12 0.7280
ITPase 1 5.3424 5.3424 5.46 0.0205
ITPase*Arm 1 10.9888 10.9888 11.23 0.0010
rs12979860 2 7.098 3.549 3.63 0.0285