Skip to main content
. 2018 May 31;13(5):e0198296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198296

Table 5. GLM analysis of change in PLT counts shows best model is useful (p = .0033, R2 = 16.7%).

Source Df Sum of Squares Mean Square F value Pr>F
Model 14 54700.2 3907.2 2.47 0.0033
Error 173 273894.6 1583.2
Corrected Total 187 328594.9
R_square Coeff Var Root MSE PLT Change Mean
0.167 988.168 39.79 4.0266
Source Df Type III SS Mean Square F-value Pr>F
ITPase 1 266.33 266.33 0.17 0.6822
Arm 1 5192.79 5192.79 3.28 0.0720
ITPase*Arm 1 7353.25 7353.25 4.64 0.0325
rs12979860 2 2485.27 1242.64 0.78 0.4578
ITPase* rs12979860 2 2521.016 1260.51 0.80 0.4527
Arm* rs12979860 2 2896.34 1448.17 0.91 0.4026
Age 1 638.71 638.71 0.4 0.5262
ITPase*Age 1 724.56 724.56 0.46 0.4996
Age*Arm 1 65.33 65.33 0.04 0.8393
Sex 1 5235.88 5235.88 3.31 0.0710
Arm*Sex 1 442.42 442.42 0.28 0.5977