Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 11;19(4):1162. doi: 10.3390/ijms19041162

Table 1.

A comparative study between the proposed carbon quantum dots/gold (CQDs/Au) nanocomposite immunoassay technique and the other previously published approaches.

Technique Principle Linear Concentration Range U mL−1 Detection Limit U mL−1 Reference
Electrochemical immunoassay Immobilization of CA 19-9 antigen with titania sol–gel on a graphite electrode 3–20 2.68 [10]
Chemiluminescent immunosensor assay Immobilization of CA 19-9 antigen on the cross-linked membrane 2.0–25 1.0 [11]
Chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay Using a derivative of 1,2-dioxetane phosphate to measure alkaline phosphatase as a labeling enzyme for the detection of CA 19-9 6.0–520 0.26 [9]
ZnO quantum dots immunoassay Employing ZnO quantum dots as an electrochemical and luminescent immunoassay 0.1–180
1.0–180
0.04
0.25
[12]
Amperometric electrochemical immunoassay Immobilization of CA 19-9 antibody on three-dimensional ordered macroporous magnetic sensors 0.05–15.65 0.01 [13]
Proposed CQDs/Au nanocomposite immunoassay method Using CQDs/Au nanocomposite in the detection of CA 19-9 by a solid- phase immunoassay 0.01–350 0.007 Present study