Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 23;5(5):1700491. doi: 10.1002/advs.201700491

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Comparison of six 2D BP fabrication methods. Each method was evaluated in terms of duration (D), yield (Y), 2D BP quality (Q), lateral dimension (L), and scalability (S) of the overall fabrication process. For D, 1 = high, 2 = moderate, and 3 = low. For Y, Q, L, and S, 1 = low, 2 = moderate, and 3 = high.