Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 10;22(6):3058–3072. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13557

Table 3.

The echocardiographic detection of the rats in each group

Group (n = 5) LVESD (mm) LVEDD (mm) LVEF (%) LVFS (%)
Sham 3.5 ± 0.3 7.5 ± 0.40 53.3 ± 4.7 89.8 ± 5.5
MI 9.1 ± 0.6* 10.9 ± 0.8* 16.51 ± 3.1* 54.8 ± 3.1*
LTS 6.5 ± 0.7** 8.9 ± 0.9** 35.6 ± 3.6** 69.7 ± 2.8**
HTS 5.5 ± 0.8** 8.8 ± 0.4** 37.5 ± 4.1** 75.5 ± 3.2**
LPS 10.8 ± 0.5** 12.1 ± 0.1** 10.6 ± 1.0** 28.6 ± 2.01**
T + LPS 5.9 ± 0.3*** 8.9 ± 0.1*** 36.9 ± 1.79*** 72.9 ± 4.87***
LTS + LPS 8.5 ± 1.2*** 10.1 ± 0.9*** 25.4 ± 3.8*** 59.0 ± 2.9***
HTS + LPS 7.2 ± 0.9*** 9.3 ± 1.1*** 33.3 ± 2.9*** 62.3 ± 3.3***

MI, myocardial infarction; LTS, low‐dose tanshinone IIA; HTS, high‐dose tanshinone IIA; LPS, Lipopolysaccharide; LVESD, left ventricular end‐systole dimension; LVEDD, left ventricular end‐diastole dimension; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVFS, left ventricular fractional shortening.

* P < .05 compared with the Sham group; **P < .05 compared with the MI group; ***P < .05 compared with the LPS group.