Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 1;6(3):e00406. doi: 10.1002/prp2.406

Table 1.

Mean (SD) steady‐state concentrations of (+)‐ and (−)‐perhexiline, and the OH‐metabolites, in DA rats administered 200 mg/kg per day of (±)‐, (+)‐ or (−)‐perhexiline maleate for 8 weeks in rat chow pellets provided each day at 1700 hour

Dosage form
(±) (+) (−)
Plasma (mg/L)
(+)‐Perhexiline 0.38 (0.29) 0.67 (0.13) n.d.
(−)‐Perhexiline 0.19 (0.12) n.d. 0.30 (0.09)
cis‐OH‐perhexiline 0.42 (0.14) 0.21 (0.06) 0.60 (0.06)
trans1‐OH‐perhexiline 0.03 (0.01) 0.05 (0.03) <LLOQ
trans2‐OH‐perhexiline 0.03 (0.02) n.d. <LLOQ
Liver (μg/g)
(+)‐Perhexiline 19.4 (14.0) 104.9 (36.8) n.d.
(−)‐Perhexiline 8.9 (6.0) n.d. 17.1 (2.8)
cis‐OH‐perhexiline 11.8 (3.2) 13.9 (6.6) 15.5 (6.6)
trans1‐OH‐perhexiline 1.1 (0.4) 4.0 (1.7) 0.6 (0.2)
trans2‐OH‐perhexiline 1.1 (0.5) 0.8 (0.7) 1.9 (1.2)
Heart (μg/g)
(+)‐Perhexiline 15.6 (6.8) 65.1 (39.1)
(−)‐Perhexiline 6.3 (2.4) 6.5 (3.3)

See Figure 1 for statistical analysis of dose‐corrected (+)‐ and (−)‐perhexiline concentrations. Samples were taken in the morning after the last dose (n.d. = not detectable; <LLOQ, below lower limit of quantification, 0.01 mg/L or μg/g).