Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 2;6(3):549–556. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.594

Table 3.

Proximate analysis of the developed soup powders with different levels of soy flour (on dry basis)

Sample Moisture (%) Ash (%) Protein (%) Fat (%) Fiber (%) Carbohydrate (%) Energy (kcal/100 g)
Control (T0) 2.83 ± 0.04a 15.77 ± 0.06e 10.66 ± 0.03e 1.43 ± 0.03e 1.10 ± 0.03e 68.21 ± 0.19a 328.38 ± 0.37e
T1 (5%) 2.51 ± 0.03b 15.91 ± 0.05d 12.57 ± 0.05d 2.76 ± 0.02d 1.24 ± 0.02d 65.01 ± 0.17b 335.16 ± 0.30d
T2 (10%) 2.30 ± 0.05c 16.01 ± 0.04c 15.54 ± 0.06c 4.10 ± 0.04c 1.56 ± 0.05c 60.49 ± 0.24c 341.02 ± 0.36c
T3 (15%) 1.92 ± 0.02d 16.19 ± 0.07b 17.50 ± 0.04b 5.69 ± 0.06b 1.75 ± 0.06b 56.95 ± 0.24d 348.99 ± 0.32b
T4 (20%) 1.71 ± 0.03e 16.40 ± 0.04a 19.97 ± 0.05a 6.97 ± 0.05a 2.30 ± 0.07a 52.65 ± 0.24e 353.21 ± 0.31a

Values are means of triplicates ± standard deviation. Values with the same superscript in a column are not significantly different (p > .05).