Table 3.

Provider‐user alliance truth table

Set	Most effectiveness consistency (Coverage)	Least effectiveness consistency (Coverage)	Number of cases
~Direct provision * ~provider relationships * ~graduated exit * ~high intensity	0.00	1.00	2
~Direct provision * ~provider relationships * ~graduated exit * high intensity	0.00	1.00	1
~Direct provision * provider relationships * ~graduated exit * ~high intensity	0.00	1.00	5
~Direct provision * provider relationships * graduated exit * ~high intensity	0.00	1.00	1
~Direct provision * provider relationships * graduated exit * high intensity	1.00	0.00	3
Direct provision * ~provider relationships * graduated exit * high intensity	0.00	1.00	1
Direct provision * provider relationships * ~graduated exit * ~high intensity	1.00	0.00	1
Direct provision * provider relationships * ~graduated exit * high intensity	1.00	0.00	1
Direct provision * provider relationships * graduated exit * high intensity	1.00	0.00	5
~Direct provision * ~provider relationships * graduated exit * ~high intensity			0
~Direct provision * ~provider relationships * graduated exit * high intensity			0
~Direct provision * provider relationships * ~graduated exit * high intensity			0
Direct provision * ~provider relationships * ~graduated exit * ~high intensity			0
Direct provision * ~provider relationships * ~graduated exit * high intensity			0
Direct provision * ~provider relationships * graduated exit * ~high intensity			0
Direct provision * provider relationships * graduated exit * ~high intensity			0
Provider relationships * (graduated exit * high intensity + direct provision * ~graduated exit)	1.00 (1.00)
~Provider relationships * (direct provision * graduated exit * high intensity + ~direct provision * ~graduated exit) + provider relationships * ~direct provision * ~high intensity		1.00 (1.00)

* = and, ~ = not, + = union set; italics indicate logical remainders; bold indicates reduced solutions.