Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 23;84(6):1187–1197. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13540

Table 4.

Learning and behavioural outcomes

Learning outcomes Control (n = 42) Intervention (n = 54) P‐value
Test score, mean (SD), % correctly answered 51 (10) 57 (12) 0.01
Proportion passed participants, mean (SD), % 26 (45) 46 (50) 0.04
Site 1: Control (n = 23) Intervention (n = 29) P‐value
Test score, mean (SD), % correctly answered 56 (10) 63 (12) 0.04
Proportion passed participants, mean (SD), % 48 (50) 66 (50) 0.07
Site 2: Control (n = 19) Intervention (n = 24) P‐value
Test score, mean (SD), % correctly answered 45 (50) 51 (80) 0.02
Proportion passed participants, mean (SD), % 0 25 (40) 0.02
Behavioural outcomes: determinants of behaviour Control (n = 39) Intervention (n = 48) P‐value
Attitude towards effect of electronic prescribing system on:
Patient/physician relationship, % positive attitude 67 80 0.12
Quality of care, % positive attitude 95 96 0.84
Physicians' job satisfaction, % positive attitude 46 57 0.25
General attitude, % positive attitude 84 89 0.32
Perceived social norm to use electronic prescribing systems during consultations:
Perceived social norm for appropriate use, % 48 49 0.98
Self‐efficacy for prescribing with an electronic prescribing system (points on scale 0–100):
A ‘fixed dose’ regimen, mean (SD) 97 (4.6) 97 (5.1) 0.83
A ‘different doses a day’ regimen, mean (SD) 90 (18) 90 (17) 0.94
A tapering scheme, mean (SD) 64 (34) 70 (26) 0.38
Providing a medication summary, mean (SD), points on scale 0–100 78 (31) 90 (18) 0.03
Behavioural outcomes Control (n = 55) Intervention (n = 60) P‐value
Patients from whom a medication history was obtained, proportion per physician, mean (SD), % 55(22) 59(23) 0.20
Patients provided with a medication summary, proportion per physician, mean (SD), % 4(7.7) 10(16) 0.06

SD, standard deviation