Skip to main content
. 2018;19(2):463–469. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.2.463

Table 2.

The Relation between the Percentages of the Positive Samples for SPAG9 Gene Expression and Clinicopathological Data at Diagnosis

SPAG9 expression percentage
Clinical Factor Number of cases - + P-value
Gender Male (n=27) 26 74
Female (n=34) 28 62 0.412
Age (years) >50 (n=39) 31 69
≤50 (n=21) 38 62 0.579
T category (A) TX (n=2) 100 0
T1 (n=5) 20 80
T2 (n=14) 43 57 0.261
T3 (n=30) 33 67
T4 (n=9) 22 78
T category (B) TX & T1 & T2 (n= 21) 41 59
T3 & T4 (n=39) 32 68 0.577
Relapse + (n=43) 46 54
- (n=13) 33 67 0.51
N category (A) N0 (n=31) 39 61
N1 (n=22) 27 73 0.686
N2 (n=9) 33 67
N category (B) N0 (n=30) 40 60
N1 & N2 (n=31) 30 70 0.426
M category M0 (n=51) 31 69
M1 (n=11) 45 55 0.485
Tumor Size (centimeters) 1.5-3 (n=22) 36 64
3.1-5.5 (n=19) 32 68 0.948
5.6-12 (n=20) 35 65
Stage Stage 0 (n=6) 33 67
Stage 1 (n=14) 36 64
Stage 2 (n=19) 47 53 0.504
Stage 3 (n=16) 25 75
Stage 4 (n=7) 14 86

p* < 0.05 significance association between gene expression and clinical risk factors; T category, The rate of growth and progression of tumors in the intestinal wall layers based on the pathological division; M, Metastasis to other organs (M0: non metastatic, M: metastatic); N, Lymph node involvement (N0: no involvement); Tumor Size, The length of tumors in centimeters; Relapse, Tumor Recurrence (+: Recurrence, -: no Recurrence); Stage, Stage of cancer according to TNM classification System and pathological data.