Skip to main content
. 2018;19(2):463–469. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.2.463

Table 3.

The Relation between the Percentages of the Positive Samples for AKAP4 Gene Expression and Clinicopathological Data at Diagnosis

AKAP4 Expression percentage
Clinical Factor Number of cases - + P-value
Gender Male (n=27) 33 67
Female (n=34) 50 50 0.207
Age (years) >50 (n=39) 62 38
≤50 (n=21) 48 52 0.414
T category Tx (n=2) 50 50
T1 (n=5) 60 40
T2 (n=14) 79 21 0.301
T3 (n=30) 43 57
T4 (n=9) 56 44
T category (B) TX & T1 & T2 (n= 21) 73 27
T3 & T4 (n=39) 45 55 0.059
M category M0 (n=51) 63 37
M1 (n=11) 27 73 0.045*
N category (A) N0 (n=31) 61 39
N1 (n=22) 50 50 0.715
N2 (n=9) 56 44
N category (B) N0 (30) 63 37
N1 & N2 (31) 52 48 0.44
Tumor Size(A) (centimeters) 1.5-3 (n=22) 55 45
3.1-5.5 (n=19) 53 47 0.889
5.6-12 (n=20) 60 40
Relapse - (n=43) 61 39
+(n=13) 38 62 0.21
Stage Stage 0 (n=6) 50 50
Stage 1 (n=14) 79 21
Stage 2 (n=19) 37 63 0.192
Stage 3 (n=16) 62 38
Stage 4 (n=7) 57 43
*

p < 0.05 significance association between gene expression and clinical risk factors; T category, The rate of growth and progression of tumors in the intestinal wall layers based on the pathological division. M, Metastasis to other organs (M0, non metastati; M, metastatic). N, Lymph node involvement (N0, no involvement); Tumor Size, The length of tumors in centimeters; Relapse, Tumor Recurrence (+: Recurrence, -: no Recurrence); Stage, Stage of cancer according to TNM classification System and pathological data.