Table 2.
Technical feasibility of the electronic adherence monitor.
| Issue | Comments |
| Device malfunction | 3 (2%) out of 63 devices malfunctioned and were replaced: one of the devices was damaged by the participant, while the remaining had technical faults. |
| Data loss | 191.6 (3%, 191.6/8365) of data were lost because of technical issues with the adherence monitors. |
| Device battery changes | Although all study participants had a solar charger and 13 had electric chargers, study staff completed 22 battery changes because of (1) poor mobile network that resulted in repeated attempts to transmit the data, which depleted the battery before its anticipated charging time; and/or (2) inability or failure of the participants to charge the batteries as requested. |
| Lost to follow-up | One participant was lost to follow-up because of a nonfunctioning phone number. |
| Change of phone numbers | Five participants changed their phone numbers |
| SMSa reminders not sent | 44 (1%) of SMS reminders were not sent because of technical challenges such as poor network coverage |
| Number of messages sent unnecessarily | 1935 (36%) SMS reminders were sent unnecessarily. In these cases, the electronic adherence monitor was opened to take medication, but poor mobile network coverage resulted in a delay or absence of the signals. |
aSMS: short message service.