Skip to main content
. 2018 May 31;84(12):e00351-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00351-18

TABLE 1.

Physicochemical characteristics of the tampons and their effects on S. aureus growth and TSST-1 productiona

Product Composition Mean tampon absorbency (ml) ± SD S. aureus
TSST-1
Mean bacterial count (CFU/ml) ± SD P value Mean concn (ng/ml) ± SD P value
Medium alone (positive control) 2.5 × 109 ± 0.2 × 109 73.9 ± 8.5
Tampons
    Tampax compak
        Regular Cotton and rayon 26.2 ± 1.2 3.2 × 107 ± 2 × 107 <0.001 0.1 ± 0 <0.001
        Super plus Cotton and rayon 40.6 ± 0.3 7.9 × 106 ± 3 × 106 <0.001 1.4 ± 0.3 <0.001
    Natracare
        Regular Cotton 28.2 ± 1.2 8.2 × 108 ± 3 × 108 <0.001 17.9 ± 3.1 <0.001
        Super plus Cotton 36.1 ± 1.1 7.4 × 108 ± 5 × 108 <0.001 70.5 ± 7.5 NS
    Nett Procomfort
        Nuit super Viscose 25.3 ± 0.3 1.7 × 108 ± 0.7 × 108 <0.001 1.3 ± 0.7 <0.001
        Normal Viscose 21.9 ± 0.2 1.9 × 108 ± 1 × 108 <0.001 0.7 ± 0.2 <0.001
        Super plus Viscose 34.4 ± 0.5 1.0 × 108 ± 0.4 × 108 <0.001 0.7 ± 0.2 <0.001
    o.b. ProComfort
        Light days Cotton and viscose 18.1 ± 1.2 2.1 × 108 ± 0.6 × 108 <0.001 0.8 ± 0.1 <0.001
        Super Cotton and viscose 30.5 ± 1.5 1.1 × 108 ± 0.6 × 108 <0.001 2.1 ± 1.0 <0.001
        Normal Cotton and viscose 25.2 ± 1.2 3.2 × 108 ± 1 × 108 <0.001 2.5 ± 1.3 <0.001
        Super plus Cotton and viscose 35.7 ± 0.5 1.1 × 108 ± 0.6 × 108 <0.001 1.8 ± 0.8 <0.001
a

Values are means ± standard deviations (n = 3 to 8). Student's t tests were used to compare bacterial CFU and TSST-1 concentrations in the presence of tampons to the values for the control. NS, not significant.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure