Skip to main content
. 2018 May 31;84(12):e00255-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00255-18

TABLE 3.

Microbial counts during tropical house cricket rearinga

Sample Sample day Microbial count (log CFU/g)
Total viable count Enterobacteriaceae Lactic acid bacteria Endospores Fungi
Peat-peel mix 0 8.5 ± 0.4 6.4 ± 0.7 4.3 ± 0.9 6.4 ± 0.3 6.9 ± 1.0
Feed 0 5.4 ± 0.3 a 4.5 ± 0.3 a 1.8 ± 0.2 a 4.5 ± 0.1 a 3.6 ± 0.1 a
26 5.0 ± 0.3 a 3.6 ± 0.2 b 1.8 ± 0.2 a 4.4 ± 0.3 a 3.7 ± 0.4 a
Substrate 12 6.3 ± 0.2 a 4.4 ± 0.1 a 5.0 ± 0.2 a 4.3 ± 0.3 a 3.6 ± 0.4 ab
26 6.2 ± 0.3 a 4.8 ± 0.3 a 4.7 ± 0.6 a 4.0 ± 0.4 a 3.2 ± 0.1 b
37 6.7 ± 0.3 a 3.6 ± 0.2 b 3.6 ± 0.5 b 4.8 ± 0.5 a 4.0 ± 0.3 a
Crickets 12 8.4 ± 0.1 a 7.5 ± 0.2 a 6.7 ± 0.1 a 3.8 ± 0.2 a 6.0 ± 0.2 a
26 8.2 ± 0.1 a 7.3 ± 0.5 a 7.2 ± 0.1 ab 3.5 ± 0.1 a 5.4 ± 0.1 b
40 8.5 ± 0.2 aA 7.2 ± 0.1 aA 7.8 ± 0.4 bA 3.7 ± 0.3 aA 5.6 ± 0.3 abA
Heat-treated cricketsb 40 2.6 ± 0.5 B <1.5 ± 0.9 B <1.0 ± 0.0 B 2.4 ± 0.4 B <2.0 ± 0.0 B
a

Data are the mean ± standard deviation values of three replicates. Means per sample with the same lowercase letter within the same column do not differ significantly (P > 0.05). Means from harvested crickets and heat-treated crickets (day 40) with the same uppercase letter within the same column do not differ significantly (P > 0.05).

b

The heat treatment consisted of bringing the crickets to a boil in a kettle with water.