Table 2.
The comparative analytical performance of the sensor with reported literature for AFB1 detection.
| Sensing Technique | Transducing Matrix | Linear Range (ng/mL) | Limit of Detection (ng/mL) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EIS, CV | Aptamers on dendrimers | 0.1–10 | 0.4 | [31] |
| Bio imprinting | Au electrode | 1–1000 | 0.00197 | [32] |
| EIS | AFB1/BSA/Au | 0.08–100 | 0.05 | [33] |
| EIS | SPIM a Au electrode | -NA- | 5.0 | [34] |
| EIS | Aptamer/GCE b | 0.1–100 | 0.05 | [35] |
| EIS | MWCNTs c/RTIL d | 0.1–10 | 0.03 | [36] |
| EIS | Ab e-SGIL f-GCE | 0.1–10 | 0.01 | [37] |
| EIS | Au-CD-trodes g | 1.56–31.2 | 0.11 | [38] |
| EIS | GO h/Au | 0.5–5 | 0.23 | [39] |
| EIS | PPy i/PPa j/rGO k | 0.0001–0.01 | 0.0001 | [40] |
| EIS | PoPD l/3DNEEs m | 0.04–8 | 0.019 | [41] |
| ELISA n | monoclonal antibodies | 0.1–10 | 0.05 | [42] |
| ELISA | monoclonal antibody | 0.05–10 | 0.036 | [43] |
| HPLC o | immunoaffinity columns | 4–20 | 3.5 | [44] |
| EIS | Ab/BSA/Au-PANI/ITO | 0.1–100 | 0.05 | This work |
a SPIM: Screen-printed interdigitated microelectrodes; b GCE: Glassy carbon electrode; c MWCNTs: Multi-wall carbon nanotubes; d RTIL: Room temperature ionic liquid; e Ab: Aflatoxin antibody; f SGIL: Silica gel ionic liquid; g CD-trodes: (electrodes obtained from recordable compact disks); h GO: Graphene oxide; i PPy: Polypyrrole; j PPa: Pyrrolepropylic acid; k rGO: Reduced graphene oxide; l PoPD: Poly(o-phenylenediamine); m 3DNEEs: gold three dimensional nanoelectrode ensembles; n ELISA: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; o HPLC: High-performance liquid chromatography.