Skip to main content
. 2018 May 3;15(5):910. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050910

Table 1.

Suicide Prevention Monitor.

Domains Measurement 1–6 Level of Implementation
1. Suicide prevention policy on organizational level
  1. No actual suicide prevention policy

  2. Policy < 5 years; contains 0–2 guideline recommendations

  3. Ibid 2 & >3 guideline recommendations

  4. Ibid 3 & reflects patients’ perspective

  5. Ibid 4 & part of general patient safety policy; clear prevention ambition

2. Monitoring suicide numbers
  1. Incomplete monitoring of suicides, no analysis of trends

  2. Complete monitoring, no analysis of trends

  3. Complete monitoring, with analysis of trends & recommendations to improve

  4. Ibid 3 & Improvement plan across service after sharing w. patient advocacy

  5. Ibid 4 & transparent publication of trends, recommendations and plans

3. Evaluation & improvement after suicide
  1. <75% of suicides are evaluated in a multidisciplinary team

  2. >75% evaluated by a multidisciplinary team using a guideline-based method or instrument

  3. Ibid 2 & Significant Others involved & requested to identify issues to improve

  4. Ibid 3 & at least 1 improvement plan completed & shared across service

  5. Ibid 4 & >25% of evaluations is based on extensive root cause analysis

4. Collaborative care
  1. No written collaborative care agreements with regional partners

  2. Written agreements with partners, describing responsibilities

  3. Ibid 2 & including at least 2 healthcare partners (e.g., General Practitioners, Emergency Departments, Addiction Care)

  4. Ibid 3 & including at least 2 partners other than healthcare (e.g., police)

  5. Ibid 4 & including annual evaluation & update of agreement.

5. Multi-annual workforce training plan
  1. There is no plan or a plan in development

  2. Plan is in development but not in effect.

  3. Complete, multi-annual plan leading to a competent present workforce

  4. Ibid 3 & Compulsory training for new employees

  5. Ibid 4 & Compulsory booster training for all employees

6. Suicide prevention training of clinicians
  1. <1% of clinicians trained in the last 2 years

  2. 1–10% of clinicians trained in the last 2 years

  3. 11–40% of clinicians trained in the last 2 years

  4. 41–80% of clinicians trained in the last 2 years

  5. 81–100% of clinicians trained in the last 2 years

Added Domains Measurement 3–6 Level of Implementation
7. Recording of suicide attempts in Electronic Health Record (EHR)
  1. <20% of known attempts are recorded

  2. 21–50% of known attempts are recorded

  3. 51–80% of known attempts

  4. 81–99% of known attempts recorded in a dedicated Electronic Health Record field or by Alert

  5. Ibid 4 & All attempts with serious medical consequences are evaluated

8. Assessment of suicidality
  1. <20% of all patients assessed in course of treatment

  2. 20–50% of all patients assessed in course of treatment

  3. 51–80% assessed using systematic interview & reported in Electronic Health Record

  4. Ibid 3 & Alert in Electronic Health Record

  5. Ibid 4 100% of patients

9. Involving family/carers
  1. <20% of suicidal patients has family/carers registered & involved at 1st contact

  2. Ibid 1 20–50%

  3. Ibid 2 51–80% & agreement on active involvement

  4. Ibid 3 81–99%

  5. Ibid 4 100% and actual involvement during entire treatment trajectory

10. Safety planning & Continuity of Care
  1. Suicidal patients have no safety plan; continuity of care is not guaranteed

  2. Suicidal patients have a safety plan; continuity of care is not guaranteed

  3. Suicidal patient have a safety plan & guaranteed continuity & warm handoffs

  4. Ibid 3: safety plan has prominent place in Electronic Health Record

  5. Ibid 4: carers are actively involved in safety & continuity