Skip to main content
. 2018 May 14;15(5):982. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050982

Table 4.

Interaction of fall history with individual and environment characteristics on FOF by Hierarchical Logistic Regression.

Level Variables (Comparison Group) Model I Adjusted OR (95% CI) Model II Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Individual Age × Fall history 0.753 (0.398–1.426) 0.742 (0.389–1.417)
Sex × Fall history 1.205 (0.627–2.318) 1.153 (0.595–2.233)
Educational level × Fall history 1.011 (0.550–1.856) 0.952 (0.508–1.784)
Current driving status × Fall history 1.058 (0.536–2.089) 1.014 (0.500–2.057)
Subjective health status × Fall history 1.138 (0.599–2.160) 1.181 (0.618–2.255)
Trouble with vision × Fall history 1.339 (0.684–2.623) 1.351 (0.686–2.663)
Diabetes mellitus × Fall history 0.888 (0.427–1.847) 0.816 (0.391–1.701)
Arthritis × Fall history 1.192 (0.570–2.492) 1.160 (0.550–2.445)
Depression × Fall history 0.980 (0.905–1.061) 0.987 (0.909–1.072)
Environmental Discomfort with the neighborhood environment × Fall history 1.051 (0.776–1.425)
Accessibility to neighborhood facilities × Fall history 0.933 (0.768–1.133)
Social support × Fall history 1.191 (0.833–1.704)

Model I was adjusted for socio-demographic (age, sex, educational level, current driving status) and health-related characteristics (subjective health status, trouble with vision, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, depression). Model II was adjusted for socio-demographic (age, sex, educational level, current driving status) and health-related (subjective health status, trouble with vision, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, depression) and environmental factors (discomfort with the neighborhood environment, accessibility to neighborhood facilities, social support).