Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 30;9(21):4873–4878. doi: 10.1039/c8sc01299g

Table 1. Optimization of the reaction conditions a .

Inline graphic
Entry Ligand Base Yield b (%)
1 dppp Cs2CO3 44
2 dppe Cs2CO3 19
3 dppf Cs2CO3 85 (83)
4 dppf K3PO4 51
5 dppf KOtBu 80
6 dppf DBU 27
7 c dppf Cs2CO3 73
8 d dppf Cs2CO3 72
9 No Cs2CO3 13
10 dppf No 31
11 e dppf Cs2CO3 78
12 f dppf Cs2CO3 N.D.
13 g dppf Cs2CO3 N.D.

aReaction conditions: 1a (0.4 mmol).

bYields were determined by crude 1H NMR using dibromomethane as an internal standard, and the isolated yields are given in parentheses.

cBase (0.4 mmol).

dBase (0.6 mmol).

eNo CsF.

fNo [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2.

gN2 instead of CO2. DBU = 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene. N.D. = not detected.