Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 16;3(3):95–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2015.05.002

Table 2.

Rodent bone defect models for testing new substitute biomaterials.

Defect site Animal Age/weight Defect size Substitute biomaterials
Distal femur F344/Fisher [83]; male Wistar rat [87] 8 wk [83]; 12–14 wk [87] 2 mm diameter & depth [83]; 2 mm in diameter & 3 mm in length [87] β-TCP bone graft substitutes [83]; polymer containing TGF-β1 [87]
Midfemur Female BALB/cJ [84]; male Fisher [88]; nude rat [89] 13–15 wk [84]; 253 g [88]; 325–400 g [89] 2 mm in length [84]; 5 mm in length [88]; 5 mm in length [89] Composite calcium phosphate & collagen [84]; marrow cells & porous ceramic [88]; BMP–silk composite matrices [89]
Calvaria Nu/nu mice [85]; nude rat [90] 6–8 wk [85]; 12 wk [90] 4 mm diameter [85]; 8 mm diameter [90] iPSCs/silk scaffold [85]; PLGA & adipose-derived stem cells [90]

BMP = bone morphogenetic protein; PLGA = poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)