Table 3.
Average performance of patients (a) and HCO (b)
| ID | Gradual | Random | Repeat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) Performance of patients | ||||
| Left brain damaged patients | ||||
| 110 | 6.00 | 8.50 | 7.50 | 2.50 |
| 442c | 8.50 | 8.75 | 6.50 | 0.25 |
| 588 | 5.75 | 6.50 | 7.00 | 0.75 |
| 788 | 7.50 | 8.50 | 9.00 | 1.00 |
| 828 | 7.75 | 7.50 | 7.00 | − 0.25 |
| 835 | 6.25 | 6.25 | 6.50 | 0.00 |
| 838 | 7.50 | 7.25 | 9.50 | − 0.25 |
| 872 | 7.75 | 7.00 | 9.00 | − 0.75 |
| 898 | 8.50 | 9.00 | 10.00 | 0.50 |
| 902 | 8.00 | 7.75 | 6.50 | − 0.25 |
| Right brain damaged patients | ||||
| 27a | 7.25 | 8.00 | 7.50 | 0.75 |
| 205a | 8.50 | 7.75 | 8.00 | − 0.75 |
| 228 | 9.50 | 7.00 | 8.50 | − 2.50 |
| 284b | 10.25 | 6.75 | 7.00 | − 3.50 |
| 489a | 8.50 | 9.75 | 8.00 | 1.25 |
| 729 | 7.50 | 7.25 | 6.00 | − 0.25 |
| 744b | 9.25 | 7.25 | 10.50 | − 2.00 |
| 792 | 9.75 | 6.75 | 10.00 | − 3.00 |
| 856 | 6.75 | 7.00 | 5.50 | 0.25 |
| 874 | 6.50 | 5.75 | 7.00 | − 0.75 |
| 932 | 7.25 | 8.50 | 11.50 | 1.25 |
| 946 | 9.25 | 7.25 | 10.00 | − 2.00 |
| ID | Gradual | Random | Random | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (b) Performance of healthy controls | ||||
| HCO (≤ 70 years) (age-matched) | ||||
| 1 | 6.25 | 7.25 | 6.00 | 1.00 |
| 46 | 5.75 | 7.00 | 5.50 | 1.25 |
| 110 | 6.75 | 7.25 | 9.50 | 0.50 |
| 143 | 6.75 | 7.50 | 7.00 | 0.75 |
| 193 | 6.25 | 7.50 | 5.50 | 1.25 |
| 230 | 6.25 | 8.00 | 7.50 | 1.75 |
| 249 | 6.25 | 8.50 | 6.00 | 2.25 |
| 351 | 6.00 | 7.75 | 7.00 | 1.75 |
| 408 | 7.50 | 7.25 | 6.00 | − 0.25 |
| HCO (>70 years) (cognitively-matched) | ||||
| 3 | 5.75 | 8.00 | 8.50 | 2.25 |
| 32 | 6.25 | 7.25 | 6.00 | 1.00 |
| 37 | 7.75 | 6.80 | 7.50 | − 0.95 |
| 148 | 7.25 | 7.75 | 8.50 | 0.50 |
| 206 | 7.50 | 8.25 | 8.50 | 0.75 |
| 208 | 8.00 | 7.00 | 5.50 | − 1.00 |
| 321 | 5.00 | 6.75 | 6.00 | 1.75 |
| 369 | 6.75 | 9.50 | 8.00 | 2.75 |
| 409 | 7.00 | 7.25 | 8.50 | 0.25 |
aNeglect at time of screening (band at time of testing): please note that there was no significant difference in any of the dependent measures between participants who showed neglect at screening (or at the time of this testing) and other RBD patients (all p’s > .05)
cTime since stroke was significantly longer than time since stroke for the other patients [t(20) = 15.58, p < .01]. This, however, did not result in better performance in this patient as evident in the table
Italic values represent performance 2 SDs outside the range of controls