Table 1.
Strategy | Current Situation | Potential for Improvement |
---|---|---|
Screening | <1% of populations in areas at risk of vectorial transmission are tested [6]. (In purposely designed screening programs, coverage has reached 70% [15]) | Design screening campaigns and PoC diagnostics that reach the largest proportion of Trypanosoma cruzi–infected individuals (in addition to children); introduce screening tests in antenatal clinics and routine hospital visits in endemic areas or target populations |
Diagnostic test performance | Sensitivity of serological diagnostics varies between 90% and 95% [24] | Increase sensitivity and specificity of diagnostics, especially for measuring parasitological cure |
Access to and abandonment of etiological treatment | Low access to treatment among T. cruzi–infected individuals and high rate of abandonment because of SAEs [9, 25] | - Reduce barriers to access to treatment - Improve availability of drugs - Reduce SAEs - Increase supervision by medical professionals during treatment course |
Parasitological efficacy (sustained parasite clearance) | Reported at 88% and 94% in 2 clinical trials, measured by real-time PCR [10, 11] | Develop novel drugs |
Abbreviations: PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PoC, point of care; SAE, severe adverse event.