Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 3;187(6):1282–1290. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy064

Table 2.

Numbers of Cases Required to Detect a Significant Associationa in 1, 2, or 3 Fecal Specimens Using an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient From 3 Fecal Sample Populations

Measure and No. of Specimens Estimated ICCb Odds Ratioc
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Relative Abundance of Phylum-Level Taxa
Actinobacteria 0.44
 1 1,496 498 273 190 151
 2 1,077 359 196 136 109
 3 938 312 171 119 94
Bacteroidetes 0.37
 1 1,780 593 325 226 180
 2 1,219 406 222 154 123
 3 1,032 344 188 131 104
Firmicutes 0.42
 1 1,568 522 286 199 158
 2 1,113 371 203 141 112
 3 961 320 175 122 97
Fusobacteria 0.18
 1 3,659 1,219 668 464 370
 2 2,158 719 394 274 218
 3 1,658 552 302 210 167
Proteobacteria 0.29
 1 2,271 757 414 288 229
 2 1,464 488 267 186 148
 3 1,196 398 218 151 121
Alpha Diversity
PD_tree 0.58
 1 1,135 378 207 144 114
 2 897 299 163 113 90
 3 817 272 149 103 82
Chao1 0.44
 1 1,496 498 273 190 151
 2 1,077 359 196 136 109
 3 938 312 171 119 94
No. of species 0.43
 1 1,531 510 279 194 155
 2 1,095 365 199 139 110
 3 949 316 173 120 96
Shannon index 0.47
 1 1,401 467 255 177 141
 2 1,030 343 188 130 104
 3 906 302 165 115 91
Beta Diversity
Unweighted UniFrac PCoA1 0.81
 1 813 271 148 103 82
 2 735 245 134 93 74
 3 710 236 129 90 71
Weighted UniFrac PCoA1 0.48
 1 1,372 457 250 174 138
 2 1,015 338 185 128 102
 3 896 298 163 113 90

Abbreviations: ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; PCoA1, first principal coordinates analysis; PD_tree, phylogenetic distance—whole tree.

a Number of cases (assuming an equal number of controls) required to detect an association at a significance level of 0.05 with 80% power, based on 1, 2, or 3 fecal specimens per subject and the ICC estimated from the fecal samples from the 3 populations. Disease prevalence = 1%.

b ICCs were the median values of 3 estimates from 3 studies: a National Cancer Institute colorectal cancer study (28, 29), the Human Microbiome Project (30), and a Costa Rica study (Dr. Paula González, INCIENSA Foundation, unpublished data, 2015).

c Odds ratio for the top 25% microbiome metric versus the bottom 25% microbiome metric.