Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 4;5(1):14. doi: 10.5334/egems.218

Table 3.

Number of Experts (out of six) Who Agreed that a Given Component of the Guideline was Clear, Comprehensive, Feasible, or Valid

CLEAR COMPREHENSIVE FEASIBLE VALID

OVERALL FRAMEWORK 3 (50%) 3 (50%)

DATA QUALITY CONSTRUCTS

Complete 4 (67%) 4 (67%)
Correct 3 (50%) 3 (50%)
Current 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
FRAMEWORK OPERATIONALIZED CONSTRUCTS

Complete x Patients 4 (67%) 4 (67%)
Complete x Variable 4 (67%) 4 (67%)
Complete x Time 3 (50%) 4 (67%)
Correct x Patient 6 (100%) 6 (100%)
Correct x Variable 4 (67%) 5 (83%)
Correct x Time 5 (83%) 5 (83%)
Current x Patients 3 (50%) 4 (67%)
Current x Variable 2 (33%) 4 (67%)
Current x Time 5 (83%) 5 (83%)
all Complete 4 (67%)
all Correct 3 (50%)
all Current 3 (50%)
RECOMMENDATIONS

Complete x Patients 4 (67%) 4 (67%)
Complete x Variable 4 (67%) 5 (83%)
Complete x Time 4 (67%) 6 (100%)
Correct x Patient 5 (83%) 5 (83%)
Correct x Variable 5 (83%) 4 (67%)
Correct x Time 6 (100%) 6 (100%)
Current x Patients 5 (83%) 5 (83%)
Current x Variable 4 (67%) 5 (83%)
Current x Time 4 (67%) 2 (33%)