Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 28;10(1):51–60. doi: 10.17925/EE.2014.10.01.51

Table 2: Summary of Studies Investigating Sugar Intake in Relation to Type 2 Diabetes Incidence.

Study Sugar Type Study Participants, Duration Results Adjustments Reference
Sugars (Risk of T2DM)
Nurses’ Health Study Sucrose 84,360 females (34–59 years) 6 years follow-up No association with risk of type 2 diabetes: RR (95 % CI) for highest vs lowest quintile of sucrose intake (BMI <29) 1.16 (0.77–1.76) (p=0.76) and 0.90 (0.64–1.28) (p=0.20) (BMI ≥29) Age, BMI, alcohol intake, family history of diabetes, prior weight change (1976–1980) and time period Colditz et al. 199246
The Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study Total sugar 36,787 adults (40–69 years) ) 4 years follow-up Negative association with incidence of type 2 diabetes: OR (95 % CI) for 100 g/day of sugars for highest vs lowest quartile of sugar intake 0.72 (0.56–0.93); p=0.01 Country of birth, BMI, physical activity, family history of diabetes, alcohol intake, energy and education level, 5-year weight change, waist-to-hip ratio, sex and age Hodge et al. 200443
The Women's Health Study Total sugar, sucrose, glucose, fructose 38,480 females (45+ years) 6 years follow-up No association with incidence of type 2 diabetes, RR (95 % CI) for highest vs lowest quintile of: total sugars 0.77 (0.521.15) (p=0.26); fructose 1.24 (0.84–1.85) (p=0.30); glucose 1.12 (0.76–1.65) (p=0.55); and a negative association for sucrose 0.59 (0.39–0.88) (p=0.05) Age, smoking, BMI, vigorous exercise, alcohol use, postmenopausal hormone use, multivitamin use, history of hypertension, high cholesterol, family history of diabetes Janket et al. 200344
The Iowa Women's Health Study Sucrose, fructose, glucose 35,988 females (55–69 years) 6 years follow-up Negative association with incidence of type 2 diabetes RR (95 % CI) for highest vs lowest quintile of: sucrose (25.8 vs 57.7 g/day) 0.81 (0.67, 0.99) (p=0.027), and a positive association for fructose (12.5 vs 35.5 g/day), RR 1.27 (1.06, 1.54) (p=0.0015) and glucose (11.1 g/day vs 30.0 g/day), RR 1.30 (1.08, 1.57) (p=0.0007) Age, BMI, total energy intake, waist to hip ratio, education, pack-years of smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity and family history of diabetes (additional analyses) Meyer et al. 200045
Finnish Mobile Clinic Health Examination Total sugar, sucrose, fructose, glucose 4,304 adults (40-69 years) 12 years follow-up Significant positive association with risk of type 2 diabetes: RR (95 % CI) for highest vs lowest quartile of: total sugars (24.8 vs 56.6 g/day) 1.42 (0.90, 2.24) (p=0.20); sucrose (33.0 vs 78.4 g/day) 1.22 (0.77, 1.92) (p=0.35); fructose (10.2 vs 26.3 g/day) 1.62 (1.01, 2.59) (p=0.03); glucose (9.2 vs 25.6 g/day) 1.68 (1.06, 2.65) (p=0.009); and fructose + glucose (19.4 vs 51.9 g/day) 1.57 (1.00, 2.48) (p=0.02) Age, sex, BMI, energy intake, smoking, geographic area, physical activity, family history of diabetes, prudent/conservative dietary pattern score, serum cholesterol, blood pressure, history of infarction, history of angina pectoris, history of cardiac failure Montonen et al. 200742
SSBs (Risk of T2DM):
Finnish Mobile Clinic Health Examination Carbonated drinks 2,360 adults (40-69 years) 12 years follow-up Borderline positive association with risk of type 2 diabetes: RR (95 % CI) for highest vs lowest quartile of median SSB intake (50.7 vs 90.2 g/day): 1.60 (0.932.76) (p=0.01) Age, sex, BMI, energy intake, smoking, geographic area, physical activity, family history of diabetes, prudent dietary score, conservative pattern score, serum cholesterol, hypertension, history of infarction, angina pectoris and cardiac failure Montonen et al. 200742
ARIC SB (fruit punch, nondiet soda, orange or grapefruit juice) 12,204 adults (4564 years) 9 years follow-up Borderline positive association with risk of type 2 diabetes: HR (95% CI) for highest vs lowest quartile of SSB intake (<1 8 oz serving/day vs >2 8 oz serving/day) for men: 1.02 (0.76–1.36) (p=0.76). Women: 1.07 (0.79-1.43) (p=0.63) Age, race, education, family history of diabetes, total caloric intake, dietary fibre, smoking, alcohol consumption, leisure activity and hypertension Paynter et al. 2006119
Nurses' Health Study II Sugar-sweetened soft drinks 91,249 adults (24-44 years) 8 years follow-up Positive association with risk of type 2 diabetes: RR (95% CI) for highest vs lowest quartile of SSB intake (<1 serving/month vs >1 serving/day): 1.83 (1.42, 2.36) (p=0.001) Age, alcohol intake, physical, activity, family history of diabetes, smoking, post-menopausal hormone use, oral contraceptive use, cereal fibre, magnesium, trans fat, ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fat, diet soft drinks, fruit juice, fruit punch Schulze et al. 200454
SSBs (Risk of T2DM):
Black Women's Health Study Sugar-sweetened soft drinks; sweetened fruit drinks 43,960 women (21-69 years) 10 years follow-up Positive association with risk of type 2 diabetes: IRR (95 % CI) for highest vs lowest quintile of SSB intake (<1 12 oz serving/month vs >2 12 oz serving/day): 1.24 (1.06-1.45) (p=0.002) Age, family history of diabetes, physical activity, smoking, education, sweetened fruit drinks, orange and grapefruit juice, fortified fruit drinks, Kool-Aid®, other fruit juices, red meat, processed meat, cereal fibre, coffee and glycaemic index Palmer et al. 2008123
Nurses' Health Study I Fruit juices 71,346 women (38-63 years) 18 years follow-up Borderline positive association with risk of type 2 diabetes: HR (95 % CI) for highest vs lowest quintile of SSB intake (<1 12 oz serving/month vs >4 12 oz servings/day): 1.35 (1.22-1.50)(p<0.001) Age, BMI, physical activity, family history of diabetes, post-menopausal hormone use, alcohol use, smoking, total energy intake, intake of: whole grains, nuts, processed meats, coffee, potatoes, sugar-sweetened soft drinks Bazzano et al. 2008121
Singapore Chinese Health Study Soft drinks (i.e. Coca-Cola®, 7UP®) 43,580 adults (45-74 years) 5.7 years follow-up Positive association with risk of type 2 diabetes: RR (95 % CI) for highest vs lowest quartile of SSB intake (none vs 2 to >3 8 oz servings/week): 1.34 (1.17-1.52) (p<0.0001) Age, sex, dialect, year of interview, educational level, smoking, alcohol, physical activity, saturated fat, dietary fibre, dairy, juice, coffee, BMI, energy intake Odegaard et al. 2010125
HPFS SSBs (colas, carbonated SSBs and NC SSBs [fruit drinks]) 40,389 men (40-75 years) 20 years follow-up Positive association with risk of type 2 diabetes: HR (95 % CI) for highest vs lowest quintile of median SSB intake (0 vs 0.93 serving/day): 1.12 (0.99-1.26) (p=0.04) Age, energy intake, smoking, physical activity, family history of type 2 diabetes, alcohol intake, multivitamin use, high triglycerides (in 1986), high blood pressure, use of diuretics De Koning et al. 201156
MESA Regular soft drinks, soda, SMW (not diet), non-alcoholic beer 5,011 adults (45-84 years) 5 years follow-up Borderline positive association with risk of type 2 diabetes: RR (95 % CI) for highest vs lowest quartile of SSB intake (0 vs >1 serving/day): 0.86 (0.62, 1.17) (p=0.09) Study site, age, sex, race, energy intake, education, physical activity, smoking, at least weekly supplement use, waist circumference and BMI Nettleton et al. 200952,124
SSBs (Risk of MetS):
MESA Regular soft drinks, soda, SMW (not diet), nonalcoholic beer 3,878 adults (45-84 years) 5 years follow-up Borderline positive association with risk of MetS: RR for highest vs lowest quartile of SSB intake (0 vs >1 serving/day): 1.15 (0.92,1.42) (p=0.65) Study site, age, sex, race, energy intake, education, physical activity, smoking, at least weekly supplement use, waist circumference and BMI Nettleton et al. 200952,124
Framingham Offspring Study Soft drinks (Coca- Cola, Pepsi®, Sprite® or other carbonated soft drink [regular or diet]) 6,039 adults (52.9 years) 4 years follow-up Positive association with risk of MetS: OR (95% CI) for highest vs lowest quartile of SSB intake (0 vs >2 12 oz serving/day): 1.67 (1.38, 2.01) Age, sex, physical activity index, smoking, dietary consumption of saturated fat, trans fat, fibre, magnesium, total calories and glycaemic index Dhingra et al. 2007120
ARIC Regular soda and sweetened fruit- flavored punch or NC beverages 9,514 adults (45-64 years) 9 years follow-up Borderline positive association with risk of MetS: HR (95% CI) for highest vs lowest tertile of SSB intake (0 vs 1 median serving/day): 1.09 (0.99-1.19) (p=0.07) Age, sex, race, education centre, total calories, smoking, physical activity, intake of meat, dairy, fruits and vegetables, whole grains and refined grains Lutsey et al. 2008122

p for trend. ARIC = Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study; BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; HPFS = Health Professionals Follow-Up Study; HR = hazard ratio; IRR = incidence rate ratio; MESA = Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis; MetS = the metabolic syndrome; NC = non-carbonated; OR = odds ratio; RR = relative risk; SB = sweetened beverage; SSB = sugar-sweetened beverage; SMW = sweetened mineral water; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; UMW = unsweetened mineral water.