Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 2;9(6):684–692. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12629

Table 3.

Performance of diagnostic tools for restaging

Predictive value EBUS‐TBNA Chest CT PET‐CT
Sensitivity 2/6 (33.3) [6.0–75.9] 2/6 (33.3) [6.0–75.9] 1/6 (16.7) [9.9–63.5]
Specificity 3/4 (75.0) [21.9–98.7] 4/4 (100.0) [39.6–100.0] 4/4 (100.0) [39.6–100.0]
Positive predictive value 2/3 (66.7) [12.5–98.2] 2/2 (100.0) [19.8–100.0] 1/1 (100.0) [5.5–100.0]
Negative predictive value 3/7 (42.9) [1.8–87.5] 4/8 (50.0) [17.4–82.6] 4/9 (44.5) [15.3–77.3]
Accuracy 5/10 (50.0) [20.1–79.9] 6/10 (60.0) [27.4–86.3] 5/10 (50.0) [20.1–79.9]

Data are presented as a numbers/total numbers (%) with [95% confidence intervals].

CT, computed tomography; EBUS, endobronchial ultrasound; TBNA, transbronchial needle aspiration; PET‐CT, positron emission tomography‐computed tomography.