Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0198504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198504

Table 2. Characteristics of included patients.

Study ID Participants(n): TPO-RA vs Control Gender: Female/Male(n): TPO-RA vs Control Age(years): TPO-RA vs Control Duration of ITP(years): TPO-RA vs Control Splenectomy status(yes/no)(n): TPO-RA vs Control Baseline platelet count(109/L): TPO-RA vs Control Concomitant ITP medication: TPO-RA vs Control
Bussel 2007 [16] 88(ELT) vs 29(PLA) 57/31 vs 16/13 51(23–79);45(23–81);55(18–85) vs 42(18–85) >0.5 vs >0.5 41/47 vs 14/15 PC ≤15×109/L: 42/88 vs 14/29 32/88 vs 6/29
Bussel 2009 [17] 76(ELT) vs 38(PLA) 43/33 vs 27/11 47(19–84) vs 51(21–79) 51±17 vs 48±16 >0.5 vs >0.5 31/45 vs 14/24 PC ≤15×109/L: 38/76 vs 17/38 32/76 vs 17/38
Cheng 2011 [18] 135(ELT) vs 62(PLA) 93/42 vs 43/19 47.0(34–56) vs 52.5(43–63) >0.5 vs >0.5 50/85 vs 21/41 16(8–22) vs 16(9–24) PC ≤15×109/L: 67/135 vs 30/62 63/135 vs 31/62
Tomiyama 2012 [19] 15(ELT) vs 8(PLA) 8/7 vs 7/1 58.0(26–72) vs 60.5(38–72) >0.5 vs >0.5 11/4 vs 5/3 21(16–25) vs 9.5(7.5–19)
PC ≤15×109/L: 3/15 vs 6/8
12/15 vs 7/8
Yang 2017 [20] 104(ELT) vs 51(PLA) 77/27 vs 40/11 48(18–84) vs 42(22–66) 44.7 ±15.91 vs 41.3±12.83 >1.0 vs >1.0 18/86 vs 7/44 14.0 vs 13.5 PC ≤15×109/L: 54/104 vs 28/51 53/104 vs 28/51
Bussel 2006 [21] 17(ROM) vs 4(PLA) 12/5 vs 3/1 45(20–63);53(19–62);42 vs 55(39–64) 5.6(0.5–24.9);9.1(0.4–37.0); 6.4 vs 3.4(0.8–3.7) 13/4 vs 1/3 17(4–25);12(5–23);15 vs 29(6–49) 4/17 vs 3/4
Kuter 2008a [22] 42(ROM) vs 21(PLA) 27/15 vs 11/10 51(27–88) vs 56(26–72) 7.8(0.6–44.8) vs 8.5(1.1–31.4) 42/0 vs 21/0 14(3–29) vs 15(2–28) 12/42 vs 6/21
Kuter 2008b [22] 41(ROM) vs 21(PLA) 27/14 vs 16/5 52(21–80) vs 46(23–88) 2.2(0.1–31.6) vs 1.6(0.1–16.2) 0/41 vs 0/21 19(2–29) vs 19(5–31) 11/41 vs 10/21
Shirasugi 2011 [23] 22(ROM) vs 12(PLA) 14/8 vs 10/2 58.5±12.6 vs 47.6±13.4 9.7±10.4 vs 7.6±5.9 10/12 vs 5/7 18.4±8.3 vs 15.8±6 13/22 vs 10/12

PC: Platelet count; ELT: Eltrombopag; ROM: Romiplostim; PLA: Placebo.