Skip to main content
. 2018 May 4;19(5):1369. doi: 10.3390/ijms19051369

Table 5.

Comparison of new GB/GSC marker candidates with established GSC marker candidates

Test Points
New Candidates Established Candidates Control
CD 276 FREM2 SPRY1 SLC47A1 CD133 CXCR4 MELK PTCH1 CD9 CD44 CYC1 HPRT1 H3F3A RPLP0 EMC7
1 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 0 0 4 4 0
2 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0
3 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0
4 4 4 4 4 0 0 4 3 0 3 0 4 0 0 0
5 4 4 4 4 3 4 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 0 0
6 4 3 4 4 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 3 0 0 3
7 4 4 4 4 3 4 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 0
8 4 4 4 4 / 4 4 0 / 4 / / 0 0 0
APPT 4.000 3.875 3.875 3.875 2.143 3.000 2.875 1.875 2.143 2.500 0.000 1.000 0.875 0.875 0.375

APPT = average points per test (rounded to three decimals); 4 points: FDR-corrected p < 0.001 and lfc > 1 (highly significant and highly overexpressed); 3 points: FDR-corrected p < 0.05 and lfc > 0, while criteria for 4 points are not met (significant and overexpressed); 1 point: p < 0.05 and lfc > 0 (overexpressed but borderline non-significant after application of FDR correction); 0 points: either p > 0.05 or lfc < 0 (non-significant or not overexpressed); /: gene not featured on the platform or in the results table.