Skip to main content
. 2018 May 11;19(5):1436. doi: 10.3390/ijms19051436

Table 1.

Classical statistical parameters of the comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) models.

Model q2 ONC R2 rpred2 SEE F Filed Contribution (%)
E H S D A
CoMFA E + S 0.679 8 0.983 0.884 0.136 229.756 53.70 46.30
CoMSIA E + H + S 0.721 9 0.972 0.734 0.180 114.912 52.40 32.40 15.20
E + S + D + A 0.705 9 0.947 0.743 0.247 59.278 58.80 14.90 14.00 12.20
E + H + D + A 0.695 11 0.987 0.826 0.125 198.216 45.10 34.00 12.60 8.20
E + H + S + A 0.74 9 0.984 0.827 0.135 206.773 44.80 29.70 13.60 11.90
E + H + S + D 0.703 9 0.972 0.698 0.178 117.713 48.70 29.70 14.30 7.30
E + H + S + D + A 0.734 9 0.985 0.891 0.132 215.609 41.40 27.60 12.30 11.20 7.50

q2: cross-validated correlation coefficient; ONC: optimal number of components; R2: non-cross-validated correlation coefficient; rpred2: predictive correlation coefficient; SEE: standard error of estimate; F: F-statistic values; E: electrostatic fields; H: hydrophobic fields; S: steric fields; D: hydrogen-bond donor fields; A: hydrogen-bond acceptor fields.