Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2018 Apr 16;348:85–98. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2018.04.013

Table 1.

Micro-computed tomography evaluation of cortical bone morphology in the femur following repeated TCDD dosing

Sex TCDD
(µg/kg)
Inner
Perimeter
(mm)
Outer
Perimeter
(mm)
Marrow
Area
(mm2)
Cortical
Area
(mm2)
Mineral
Density
(mg/cm3)
Mineral
Content
(µg)
Sex Comparison Female 0 3.54 ± 0.05 4.84 ± 0.04 0.89 ± 0.02 0.81 ± 0.02 667 ± 14 10.7 ± 0.5
30 3.47 ± 0.06 4.81 ± 0.03 0.87 ± 0.03 0.80 ± 0.02 669 ± 11 10.4 ± 0.3
Male 0 3.68 ± 0.06 5.02 ± 0.06 0.95 ± 0.02 0.84 ± 0.06 662 ± 16 10.6 ± 0.8
30 3.66 ± 0.02 4.90 ± 0.01 0.95 ± 0.01 0.76 ± 0.01 635 ± 7 8.9 ± 0.3
Dose Response Male 0 3.85 ± 0.06 4.95 ± 0.06 1.05 ± 0.04 0.69 ± 0.02 766 ± 16 9.6 ± 0.6
0.01 3.66 ± 0.05 4.84 ± 0.06 0.95 ± 0.02 0.72 ± 0.03 769 ± 22 10.4 ± 0.7
0.03 3.63 ± 0.09 4.90 ± 0.04 0.94 ± 0.04 0.74 ± 0.04 744 ± 12 10.4 ± 0.9
0.1 3.62 ± 0.06 4.93 ± 0.05 0.94 ± 0.03 0.78 ± 0.03 801 ± 22 12.2 ± 0.7
0.3 3.75 ± 0.04 4.97 ± 0.02 1.01 ± 0.02 0.76 ± 0.02 725 ± 27 10.4 ± 0.5
1 3.66 ± 0.08 4.88 ± 0.05 0.94 ± 0.03 0.73 ± 0.05 735 ± 13 10.1 ± 1.0
3 3.65 ± 0.05 4.86 ± 0.06 0.94 ± 0.02 0.73 ± 0.01 702 ± 10 9.7 ± 0.3
10 3.64 ± 0.07 4.86 ± 0.03 0.94 ± 0.03 0.75 ± 0.04 702 ± 19 9.9 ± 0.8
30 3.67 ± 0.08 4.75 ± 0.07* 0.93 ± 0.03* 0.63 ± 0.03 652 ± 14* 7.2 ± 0.6
*

Statistical significance (* p ≤ 0.05) was determined using either a Student’s t-test (sex comparison study) or a one-way ANOVA analysis followed by Dunnet’s post hoc test (dose-response study).