Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Densitom. 2017 Dec 1;21(3):347–354. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.11.003

Table 3.

Association between QCT volumetric BMD and all-cause mortality

Men Women
HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
Lumbar vBMD
Model 1: Unadjusted 0.70 (0.59, 0.84) 0.0001 0.65 (0.54, 0.78) <0.0001
Model 2: Adjusted for age, race, smoking, alcohol use, estrogen use (women only) 0.90 (0.75, 1.07) 0.2380 0.87 (0.69, 1.10) 0.2450
Model 3: Model 2 plus HTN, prior CVD, CAC 0.96 (0.81, 1.14) 0.6397 0.89 (0.70, 1.13) 0.3360
Model 4: Model 3 plus whole body lean mass 0.91 (0.75, 1.12) 0.3915 1.00 (0.77, 1.30) 0.9917
Model 5: Model 3 plus whole body fat mass 0.91 (0.75, 1.10) 0.3342 1.02 (0.78, 1.32) 0.9090
Thoracic vBMD
Model 1: Unadjusted 0.74 (0.64, 0.86) <0.0001 0.65 (0.55, 0.76) <0.0001
Model 2: Adjusted for age, race, smoking, alcohol use, estrogen use (women only) 0.92 (0.79, 1.06) 0.2464 0.87 (0.72, 1.04) 0.1242
Model 3: Model 2 plus HTN, prior CVD, CAC 0.94 (0.81, 1.10) 0.4532 0.87 (0.72, 1.05) 0.1547
Model 4: Model 3 plus whole body lean mass 0.91 (0.74, 1.11) 0.3441 0.95 (0.75, 1.20) 0.6644
Model 5: Model 3 plus whole body fat mass 0.90 (0.75, 1.09) 0.2738 0.98 (0.77, 1.23) 0.8379

HR per sex-specific SD is presented.