Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Densitom. 2017 Dec 1;21(3):347–354. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.11.003

Table 4.

Association between DXA areal BMD and all-cause mortality

Men Women
HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
Lumbar (L1–L4) aBMD
Model 1: Unadjusted 1.07 (0.91, 1.25) 0.3997 0.86 (0.72, 1.04) 0.1243
Model 2: Adjusted for age, race, smoking, alcohol use, estrogen use (women only) 1.07 (0.92, 1.24) 0.3753 1.01 (0.84, 1.20) 0.9559
Model 3: Model 2 plus HTN, prior CVD, CAC 1.00 (0.88, 1.15) 0.9535 1.02 (0.84, 1.23) 0.8781
Model 4: Model 3 plus whole body lean mass 1.01 (0.87, 1.18) 0.8534 1.00 (0.82, 1.21) 0.9718
Model 5: Model 3 plus whole body fat mass 0.99 (0.86, 1.14) 0.8924 1.01 (0.84, 1.23) 0.8825
Total Hip aBMD
Model 1: Unadjusted 0.90 (0.77, 1.06) 0.2223 0.73 (0.60, 0.89) 0.0014
Model 2: Adjusted for age, race, smoking, alcohol use, estrogen use (women only) 1.02 (0.87, 1.21) 0.7737 0.95 (0.78, 1.16) 0.6195
Model 3: Model 2 plus HTN, prior CVD, CAC 1.00 (0.85, 1.17) 0.9625 0.99 (0.81, 1.22) 0.9471
Model 4: Model 3 plus whole body lean mass 1.01 (0.84, 1.22) 0.9194 0.93 (0.75, 1.16) 0.5311
Model 5: Model 3 plus whole body fat mass 0.95 (0.80, 1.12) 0.5508 0.99 (0.79, 1.23) 0.8953
Femoral Neck aBMD
Model 1: Unadjusted 0.93 (0.80, 1.10) 0.3991 0.72 (0.59, 0.89) 0.0020
Model 2: Adjusted for age, race, smoking, alcohol use, estrogen use (women only) 1.05 (0.89, 1.23) 0.5759 0.91 (0.72, 1.14) 0.4011
Model 3: Model 2 plus HTN, prior CVD, CAC 1.03 (0.88, 1.21) 0.6899 0.96 (0.76, 1.22) 0.7301
Model 4: Model 3 plus whole body lean mass 1.05 (0.88, 1.25) 0.5704 0.91 (0.71, 1.16) 0.4352
Model 5: Model 3 plus whole body fat mass 1.00 (0.85, 1.18) 0.9882 0.95 (0.74, 1.21) 0.6751
Distal radius aBMD
Model 1: Unadjusted 0.87 (0.75, 1.02) 0.0879 0.69 (0.59, 0.81) <0.0001
Model 2: Adjusted for age, race, smoking, alcohol use, estrogen use (women only) 0.94 (0.81, 1.09) 0.4043 0.81 (0.68, 0.97) 0.0191
Model 3: Model 2 plus HTN, prior CVD, CAC 0.97 (0.84, 1.12) 0.6618 0.80 (0.65, 0.97) 0.0219
Model 4: Model 3 plus whole body lean mass 0.98 (0.83, 1.14) 0.7701 0.76 (0.63, 0.92) 0.0056
Model 5: Model 3 plus whole body fat mass 0.96 (0.83, 1.11) 0.5468 0.78 (0.64, 0.95) 0.0134
Mid radius aBMD
Model 1: Unadjusted 0.87 (0.74, 1.01) 0.0592 0.70 (0.59, 0.82) <0.0001
Model 2: Adjusted for age, race, smoking, alcohol use, estrogen use (women only) 0.96 (0.82, 1.11) 0.5587 0.81 (0.68, 0.96) 0.0162
Model 3: Model 2 plus HTN, prior CVD, CAC 0.99 (0.86, 1.15) 0.9451 0.81 (0.68, 0.96) 0.0164
Model 4: Model 3 plus whole body lean mass 1.00 (0.86, 1.17) 0.9655 0.79 (0.67, 0.93) 0.0057
Model 5: Model 3 plus whole body fat mass 0.98 (0.85, 1.14) 0.8139 0.81 (0.68, 0.96) 0.0135
Whole Body aBMD
Model 1: Unadjusted 0.91 (0.77, 1.09) 0.3076 0.79 (0.65, 0.96) 0.0160
Model 2: Adjusted for age, race, smoking, alcohol use, estrogen use (women only) 0.99 (0.84, 1.17) 0.9311 0.97 (0.80, 1.18) 0.7851
Model 3: Model 2 plus HTN, prior CVD, CAC 0.94 (0.81, 1.09) 0.4158 1.01 (0.82, 1.23) 0.9611
Model 4: Model 3 plus whole body lean mass 0.94 (0.79, 1.12) 0.5156 0.98 (0.79, 1.20) 0.8195
Model 5: Model 3 plus whole body fat mass 0.92 (0.79, 1.08) 0.3138 1.00 (0.82, 1.23) 0.9779

HR per sex-specific SD is presented.