Table 4.
Rank of each treatment for each outcome
| BOP | Mean Rank | SD | Prob(Best)* | SUCRA | SUCRA_rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toothpick+OHI | 1.7 | 1.445 | 0.704 | 0.922 | 1 |
| WJ | 2.314 | 0.768 | 0.126 | 0.854 | 2 |
| Powered Ctrl+WJ | 3.48 | 1.787 | 0.089 | 0.724 | 3 |
| IB | 3.834 | 2.04 | 0.08 | 0.685 | 4 |
| TP | 5.515 | 1.419 | 0 | 0.498 | 5 |
| Powered Ctrl | 5.72 | 1.32 | 0 | 0.476 | 6 |
| FL | 6.583 | 0.977 | 0 | 0.38 | 7 |
| FL_2 | 7.335 | 1.244 | 0 | 0.296 | 8 |
| MD | 8.631 | 1.002 | 0 | 0.152 | 9 |
| Ctrl | 9.889 | 0.325 | 0 | 0.012 | 10 |
|
| |||||
| GI | Mean Rank | SD | Prob(Best)* | SUCRA | SUCRA_rank |
|
| |||||
| IB | 1.734 | 1.241 | 0.647 | 0.908 | 1 |
| WJ | 1.948 | 0.74 | 0.274 | 0.882 | 2 |
| MD | 3.036 | 0.78 | 0.029 | 0.745 | 3 |
| Powered Ctrl+WJ | 3.709 | 1.399 | 0.049 | 0.661 | 4 |
| FL | 5.216 | 0.729 | 0 | 0.473 | 5 |
| Powered Ctrl | 6.358 | 0.76 | 0 | 0.33 | 6 |
| TP | 6.415 | 1.386 | 0 | 0.323 | 7 |
| FL_2 | 7.623 | 0.559 | 0 | 0.172 | 8 |
| Ctrl | 8.96 | 0.196 | 0 | 0.005 | 9 |
|
| |||||
| PCR | Mean Rank | SD | Prob(Best)* | SUCRA | SUCRA_rank |
|
| |||||
| IB | 1.359 | 0.686 | 0.699 | 0.955 | 1 |
| Powered Ctrl+WJ | 2.342 | 1.767 | 0.293 | 0.832 | 2 |
| MD | 3.232 | 0.954 | 0.006 | 0.721 | 3 |
| FL | 4.833 | 1.022 | 0 | 0.521 | 4 |
| WJ | 5.206 | 1.883 | 0.001 | 0.474 | 5 |
| Powered Ctrl | 5.661 | 1.073 | 0 | 0.417 | 6 |
| TP | 6.8 | 2.296 | 0.002 | 0.275 | 7 |
| FL_2 | 7.221 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.222 | 8 |
|
| |||||
| PD | Mean Rank | SD | Prob(Best)* | SUCRA | SUCRA_rank |
|
| |||||
| IB | 1.191 | 0.542 | 0.878 | 0.904 | 1 |
| FL | 1.901 | 0.357 | 0.119 | 0.55 | 2 |
| MD | 2.908 | 0.299 | 0.003 | 0.046 | 3 |
*
Prob(Best): Probability of being the best treatment
SUCRA: Surface under the cumulative ranking curve. The larger the SUCRA value for the treatment k, the higher its rank among the available treatment options. SUCRA would be 1 when a treatment is certain to be the best and 0 when a treatment is certain to be the worst