Table 3.
Design and analysis characteristics of re-randomization trials
Re-randomization trials (n = 5) | |
---|---|
Explicitly stated that randomizations for the same patient were independent | |
No | 5 (100) |
Yes | 0 (0) |
Explicitly stated that patients were only re-randomized when the follow-up period from their previous enrollment was complete | |
No | 5 (100) |
Yes | 0 (0) |
Placed limit on maximum number of times each patient could be enrolled in the trial? | |
No | 0 (0) |
Yesa | 1 (20) |
Not reported | 4 (80) |
Based sample size calculation on a parallel group design | |
No | 0 (0) |
Yes | 3 (60) |
No sample size calculation reported | 2 (40) |
Analyzed data on a per-episode or per-patient basis | |
Per-episode | 5 (100) |
Per-patient | 0 (100) |
Both | 0 (100) |
Did analysis account for correlation between treatment episodes from the same patient? | |
No (independence analysis) | 5 (100) |
Yes (e.g., GEE or mixed-effects models) | 0 (0) |
Did analysis adjust for any factors associated with re-randomization, such as episode number? | |
No | 5 (100) |
Yes | 0 (0) |
Reported the number of treatment episodes for each patientb | |
No | 2 (40) |
Yes | 3 (60) |
One trial used a limit of four treatment episodes.
In two trials, all patients were enrolled for one or two treatment episodes. In the third trial, most patients were enrolled for one or two treatment episodes, and a small proportion of patients were enrolled for three or more episodes.