Table 1.
Comparison of performance of stationary vs. out-sourcing mobile KETEMsc.
| Stationary KETEM | Out-sourcing mobile KETEM | Total | pa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total numbers | 145 | 10 | 155 | ||
| Total working days | 252 | 234 | – | ||
| Number of patients screened per day | 8.9 ± 7.03 | 31.8 ± 10.45 | – | 0.000b | |
| Mammography device | Conventional + CR | 34 | 0 | 34 | |
| Digital | 111 | 10 | 121 | ||
| Number of screened patients | Conventional + CR | 43,043 (13.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | 43,043 | |
| Digital | 282,215 (86.8) | 89,544 (100.0%) | 371,759 | ||
| Age | 40–44 | 74,989 (23.1%) | 20,883 (23.3%) | 95,872 | |
| 45–49 | 66,533 (20.5%) | 18,318 (20.5%) | 84,851 | 0.104 | |
| 50–59 | 124,106 (38.2%) | 33,795 (37.7%) | 157,901 | ||
| 60–69 | 59,630 (18.3%) | 16,548 (18.5%) | 76,178 | ||
| BI-RADS score | Insufficient | 1175 (0.4%) | 505 (0.6%) | 1680 | |
| Conventional + CR | 414 | 0 | 414 | ||
| Digital | 761 | 505 | 1266 | ||
| 0-4-5 | 17,062 (5.2%) | 4937 (5.5%) | 21,999 | 0.000 | |
| 1–2 | 307,021 (94.4%) | 84,102 (93.9%) | 391,123 | ||
| Breast pattern | A | 50,067 (15.5%) | 9553 (10.7%) | 59,62 | |
| B | 149,106 (46.0%) | 45,734 (51.4%) | 194,84 | ||
| C | 110,004 (34.0%) | 30,428 (34.2%) | 140,432 | 0.000 | |
| D | 14,906 (4.5%) | 3324 (3.7%) | 18,23 |
a
Pearson chi square test.
b
Mann-Whitney U test.
c
KETEM: Cancer early diagnosis, screening and education centers.