Skip to main content
. 2018 May 14;115(22):5641–5646. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1722024115

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Comparison of the predicted dynamic substrate glass transition temperatures Tg with values obtained from simulation. The solid circles are the Tgsub values directly obtained from our data (same data as in Fig. 5A) with ε=1.25, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0. The solid curves are the Tgsub values predicted from Eq. 4. The curves are obtained by first fitting the thickness dependence of the mean Tg(h) values from dynamic and thermodynamic methods using a Gibbs–Thomson-inspired model (see SI Appendix, section IV for a description).