Skip to main content
. 2018 May 14;115(22):5780–5785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1801512115

Table 1.

Key predictors of infection status

S vs. U AS vs. U S[sub] vs. U AS[sub] vs. U Infected (all) vs. U
Foot Arm Foot Arm Foot Arm Foot Arm Foot Arm
Sensitivity, % 91 89 100 75 100 80 100 100 (90) 95 92
Accuracy, % 85 89 78 78 100 88 100 100 (92) 77 80
Top predictors C-49 C-56 C-43 C-49 C-5 C-5 C-5 C-5 C-17 C-56
C-9 C-5 C-56 C-56 C-20 C-20 C-17 C-20 C-49 C-61
C-5 C-22 C-61 C-31 C-17 C-15 C-20 C-52 C-31 C-5
C-43 C-17 C-5 C-20 C-14 C-52 C-9 C-8 C-61 C-51
C-17 C-52 C-49 C-14 C-56 C-5 C-31
C-31 C-62
C-17 C-15
C-44 C-31

For each comparison, compounds are listed in order of importance for the predictive model. Compound IDs are provided in Table 2. Numbers in parentheses show model sensitivity/accuracy when using only the top four predictors.