Table 1.
Summary of outcome measures, total costs, and cost effectiveness of RACD using microscopy and LAMP by sub-district over study period
| Sub-district | Population at risk | Outcome measures | Total cost | Average costs | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of RACD events | No. of subjects screened | No. infections identified (%) | Total | Per PAR per year | Per RACD event | Per individual screened | Per infection identified | ||
| Lhoong | 9592 | 14 | 511 | 3 (0.6%) | $12,703 | $0.79 | $907 | $25 | $4234 |
| Saree | 11,346 | 12 | 527 | 3 (0.6%) | $12,748 | $0.67 | $1062 | $24 | $4249 |
| Kuta Cot Glie | 10,560 | 8 | 377 | 0 (0%) | $9657 | $0.55 | $1207 | $26 | – |
| Indrapuri | 14,052 | 2 | 80 | 0 (0%) | $4391 | $0.19 | $2196 | $55 | – |
| Lhoknga | 15,659 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0%) | $2918 | $0.11 | – | – | – |
| Total | 61,209 | 36 | 1495 | 6 (0.4%) | $42,418 | $0.42a | $1178 | $28 | $7070 |
Population at risk is defined as total population of sub-district
LAMP loop-mediated isothermal amplification, RACD reactive case detection
aSub-district average cost per PAR