Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 1;19:181. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2106-7

Table 1.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of patients attending advanced practice physiotherapy orthopaedic and rheumatology services

Clinical outcomes Orthopaedics (n = 13,565) Rheumatology (n = 2754) Chi-Square p-valueѱ
n (%) n (%) Χ2
Return appointments 2064 (15.2) 532 (19.3) 28.8 < 0.001
Consultant-supported decisionsф 2719 (21.7) 739 (28.4) 55.2 < 0.001
Clinical investigationsΩ 4023 (29.7) 827 (30.0) 0.2 0.7
Injection administered 506 (3.7) 179 (6.5) 43.7 < 0.001
Surgical listingΧ 361 (2.7) 43 (1.6) 11.5 < 0.001
Orthopaedic/Rheumatology Consultant referralb 2437 (19.0) 343 (12.9) 55.6 < 0.001
Physiotherapy referrala 5492 (41.5) 1022 (38.0) 11.4 < 0.001
(n = 5798) (n = 1211)
Clinical imaging^ 1634 (28.2) 231 (19.1) 42.5 < 0.001

Unknown clinic (n = 258); ѱ p < 0.05 considered significant; фConsultant-supported decisions valid data for: orthopaedics = 12,541; rheumatology = 2602; Ω Investigations include imaging; ΧSurgical listing includes guided injections (valid data for orthopaedics =13,564); ^Clinical imaging data recorded for latter 5 months; bConsultant referral valid data for: orthopaedics = 12,843, rheumatology =2662; aPhysiotherapy includes hospital, primary care, and private services (valid data for: orthopaedics = 13,244, rheumatology = 2692)