Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 20;9(2):232–240. doi: 10.1007/s13193-018-0725-y

Table 4.

Complications based on the treatment type

Study Unwin et al. [41] Jeys et al. [36]
Reason for revision/revision type Number of patients (%) Number of patients (%)
Aseptic loosening
 Revision implant 65 (31) 75 (28.6)
 Re-cement 6 (2.9)
 Acetabular cup 3 (1.4)
 Total 74 (35.2)
Infection
 Amputation 28 (13.3) 75 (28.6)
 Revision 17 (8.1)
 Removed implant 1 (0.5)
 Total 46 (21.9)
Instability
 Total N/A 54 (20.6)
Recurrence
 Amputation 52 (24.8) 36 (13.7)
 Revision 1 (0.5)
 Rotationplasty 1 (0.5)
 Total 54 (25.7)
Implant complications
 Fracture 17 (8.1) 7 (2.6)
 Extension complications 8 (3.8)
 Implant fracture 1 (0.5) 16 (6.1)
 Rotational loosening N/A 5 (1.9)
 Total 26 (12.4) 28 (10.6)
Biological complications
 Bone fracture, revision 3 (1.4) N/A
 Sterile abscess/Ti cyst, 3 (1.4) N/A
Amputated
 DVT/PE N/A 9 (3.4)
 Circulatory problems 2 (1.0) N/A
 Pain 2 (1.0) 4 (1.5)
 Excessive stiffness N/A 5 (1.9)
 Common peroneal n. palsy N/A 7 (2.6)
 Wrist drop N/A 2 (0.7)
 Hematoma N/A 3 (1.1)
 Total 10 (4.8) 30 (11.4)
Total 210 (100) 262 (100)
Total patients per study 1001 776

Other studies were not included due to incomplete data