Table 3.

Unstandardized Estimates From Conditional Two-Part Latent Growth Models of Alcohol Use

	Model 1		Model 2		Model 3		Model 4		Model 5
	Intercept	Slope	Intercept	Slope	Intercept	Slope	Intercept	Slope	Intercept	Slope
Part 1: Use versus nonuse
Gendera	.49	−.33*	.66	−.28*	.65	−.27*	.69	−.24	.65	−.23
African American	−.92	−.13	−.75	−.10	−.79	−.07	−.77	− .09	−.86	−.06
Latino	− .51	−.03	−.54	−.04	−.55	−.03	−.54	− .05	−.61	.03
SES	−.83**	.12	−.84***	.09	− .85***	.10	−.83***	.10	−.81**	.05
Overt aggression	.79***	− .06	.74**	−.06	.75**	−.07	.77**	− .03	.75**	−.02
Relational aggression	.05	.23**	−.26	.14*	−.24	.12	− .28	.06	−.25	.07
Social preference	.41*	.09			.05	− .04	.27	.02	−.09	.02
Popularity			.60**	.16*	.56*	.19	.48	.08	.56	.33**
Social Preference × Gender							− .43	−.09
Popularity × Gender							.12	.25
Social Preference × African American									.18	.06
Social Preference × Latino									−.46	−.46*
Popularity × African American									.22	−.49**
Popularity × Latino									−.46	−.06
Part 2: Frequency
Gender	−.24	−.05	−.23	−.04	−.22	−.04	−.21	−.03	−.21	−.03
African American	− .17	−.08*	− .19	−.06	− .15	− .06	− .17	− .06	−.11	−.07
Latino	−.18	−.05	−.19	−.06	−.18	− .06	− .20	−.05	−.23	−.04
SES	− .24**	.02	−.23**	.02	−.23**	.02	−.24**	.02	−.24**	.004
Overt aggression	.13	− .01	.14*	−.02	.13	− .01	.12	−.02	.13	−.002
Relational aggression	.08	.04*	.07	−.004	.05	− .001	.09	− .01	.03	−.01
Social preference	− .02	.05**			− .05	.01	− .12	.02	−.04	.01
Popularity			.01	.08***	.05	.07**	.16	.05*	.09	.09***
Social Preference × Gender							.15	− .03
Popularity × Gender							−.24*	.04
Social Preference × African American									−.18	.06
Social Preference × Latino									.13	−.10
Popularity × African American									.01	−.10*
Popularity × Latino									−.10	−.04

Note. SES = socioeconomic status.

^aMale was the reference group (coded as 0).

^*p < .05.

^**p < .01.

^***p < .001.