Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 1;102(2):296–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.01.005

Table 3.

Comparison of Behavioral and Electrophysiological Phenotypes between 15q13.3 Homozygous Knockout Mice and Otud7a-Null Mice

Phenotypes/Behavioral Assays Df(h15q13)−/− Otud7a−/−
Body weight decreased decreased
Ultrasonic vocalization impaired impaired
Acoustic startle impaired impaired
Prepulse inhibition impaired impaired
Grip strength decreased decreased in female, trend toward decrease in male
Seizures/EEG recording altered seizure response to PTZ administration spontaneous EEG abnormalities
Open field no significant change no significant change
Three-chamber test no impairment no impairment
Developmental delay not assessed developmental delay
Rotarod performance not assessed impaired
Elevated plus maze not assessed no significant change
Novel object recognition not assessed no significant change
Forced swimming not assessed no significant change
Partition test not assessed no impairment
Morris water maze inconclusive due to vision impairment not assessed due to motor deficits
Nest buildinga impaired trend toward impairment but no significant change
Fear conditioning decreased cued fear memory no significant change in female, increased cued fear memory in male

Reference for behavioral phenotypes in Df(h15q13)−/− mice: Forsingdal et al.20

a

In the Df(h15q13)−/− study, 6 knockout mice with mixed gender were assessed. In our study, 14 male Otud7a−/− mice and 16 female Otud7a−/− mice were assessed.