Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 4.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2017 May 12;19(11):2865–2868. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b01095

Table 1.

Optimization of Cr-catalyzed cyclopropanation.

graphic file with name nihms969341u2.jpg

entry cat. (mol%) solvent 2a equiv time (h) NMR yield (%)a
3aa 4aa 5aa
1b Cr1 (1) CH3NO2 5 24 60 8 7
2 Cr1 (1) CH3NO2 5 24 61 10 8
3 Cr1 (1) CH3NO2 1.1 40 60 8 11
4 Cr2 (1) CH3NO2 1.1 40 5 1 1
5 Cr3 (1) CH3NO2 1.1 40 40 8 7
6 Cr4 (1) CH3NO2 1.1 40 50 9 8
7 Ru1 (1) CH3NO2 1.1 24 3 0 0
8 Ru1 (1) CH3NO2 5 14 9 4 5
9 Ru2 (5) + MV (15)c CH3NO2 5 21 12 2 2
10 Ru2 (5) CH3NO2 5 21 0 0 0
11 Cr1 (1) CHCl3 1.1 24 18 1 2
12 Cr1 (1) acetone 1.1 24 57 5 8
13 Cr1 (1) CH2Cl2 1.1 24 73 2 7
14 Cr1 (1) CH3CN 1.1 24 67 8 10
15 Cr1 (1) DCE 1.1 24 73 0 5
16 none DCE 1.1 14 0 0 0
17 CrCl3 (10) DCE 1.1 49 0 0 0
18d Cr1 (1) DCE 1.1 49 0 0 0
a

Determined using veratraldehyde as a standard.

b

Near UV light (bulbs at 300, 350, and 419 nm) used instead of 23 W CFL.

c

MV: methyl viologen2+·(PF6)2.

d

Reaction performed in dark (foil wrapped).