Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 1;32:2058738418772652. doi: 10.1177/2058738418772652

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

BISPR promoted the development of TPC cells by inhibiting miR-21-5p expression. (a) Compared with miR-NC group, the expression level of miR-21-5p in miR-21-5p mimics group was much higher and that in miR-21-5p inhibitor group was much lower. At the meantime, miR-21-5p expression in sh-BISPR + miR-21-5p inhibitor group was much higher than that in miR-21-5p inhibitor group. (b) The iodine uptake of BHT101 and Hth83 cell lines with miR-21-5p mimics was much higher than that in miR-NC group, while that with miR-21-5p inhibitor was lower than that in the miR-NC group. At the same time, the cell iodine uptake in sh-BISPR + miR-21-5p inhibitor group was much higher than that in miR-21-5p inhibitor group. *P < 0.05, compared with miR-NC group; #P < 0.05, compared with miR-21-5p inhibitor group. (c and d) The cell viability of BHT101 and Hth83 cell lines with miR-21-5p mimics was much lower than that in miR-NC group, while that with miR-21-5p inhibitor was higher than that in miR-NC group. However, cell viability in sh-BISPR + miR-21-5p inhibitor group was lower than that in miR-21-5p inhibitor group. *P < 0.05, compared with miR-NC group; **P < 0.01, compared with miR-NC group; #P < 0.05, compared with miR-21-5p inhibitor group. (e) The number of invasive cells in BHT101 and Hth83 cell lines with miR-21-5p mimics was much lower than that in miR-NC group while that with miR-21-5p inhibitor was higher than that in the miR-NC group. However, the number of invasive cells in sh-BISPR + miR-21-5p inhibitor group was lower than that in miR-21-5p inhibitor group. *P < 0.05, compared with miR-NC group; #P < 0.05, compared with miR-21-5p inhibitor group.