Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 28;27(12):2090–2100. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy113

Table 1.

Physiological parameters of isolated EDL muscles used in ex vivo force measurements

Parameter C57BL/10 mdx DysΔH2-R15-mdx DysΔH2-R19/ΔCT-mdx DysΔR4–23/ΔCT-mdx flµDys-mdx DysΔR2–15/ΔR18–23/ΔCT-mdx Dp116-mdx P-value
Body mass (g) 36.2±2.2 36.4±1.3 36.0±0.7 40.4±1.4 31.6±0.7d 37.4±1.6 31.3±1.7d 32.2±0.7d <0.001
EDL mass (mg) 13.1±0.3 18.3±0.8a 12.3±0.4gd 12.5±0.1gd 11.9±0.3gd 12.6±0.4gd 10.7±0.3agd 20.0±0.7a <0.001
Lo (mm) 12.9±0.1 13.0±0.2 12.8±0.3 13.9±0.1 12.9±0.2 12.8±0.5 12.6±0.2 13.9±0.2 0.051
CSA (mm2) 2.2±0.1 3.2±0.2a 2.1±0.1gd 1.9±0.1adg 2.0±0.1deg 2.1±0.1deg 1.8±0.1adg 3.1±0.01a <0.001
Po (mN) 480±8.9 408±13ag 349±21ag 378±24ag 428±11abcdeg 363±7.3ag 380±12ag 354±29a <0.001
Specific Po (N/cm2) 21.5±0.5 13.1±0.5a 17.8±0.8bg 20.3±0.9bg 20.4±0.9bg 19.2±0.8bg 19.7±0.8bg 11.6±1.1ab <0.001
ΔP0 (%) 1.2±0.4 91.0±1.2a 1.0±1.7 7.0±1.6 5.9±0.8 2.0±1.8 36.7±4.5abg 88.6±3.7a <0.001
Peak eccentric force (mN) 795±15 614±17a 644±27a 642±38a 704±24a 594±9.7a 601±32a 532±36a <0.001
Eccentric force loss (%) 4.6±0.5 87.0±1.1a 6.2±4.4 11.8±1.5 13.7±1.5 8.3±2.8 35.4±4.2abg 80.0±4.3a <0.001
Active stiffness (N/m) 935±36 671±17a 675±26a 784±46a 781±35a 694±19a 674±28a 613±30a <0.001
Peak twitch (mN) 144±6.5 104±4.7a 89.9±6.1a 117±4.5ace 101±7.0ac 92.2±5.5a 116±3.7ace 110±6.3a <0.001
Twitch force development time (ms) 18.0±0.3 18.7±0.5 19.1±0.2g 19.5±0.2g 19.5±0.9g 18.3±0.3 19.5±0.2g 17.1±0.5 <0.001
Twitch ½ relaxation time (ms) 16.0±0.5 20.4±1.1ag 22.4±0.5ag 22.3±1.3ag 19.5±1.6g 20.7±0.9ag 19.5±0.5g 15.2±0.6 <0.001
Tetanic maximal rate of contraction (mN/s) 15.7±0.6 12.2±0.6a 10.8±0.4a 13.4±0.1c 12.1±0.4a 12.1±0.4a 12.0±0.4a 12.3±0.7a <0.001
Tetanic maximal rate of relaxation (mN/s) 23.2±0.6 19.1±1.1a 16.7±1.3a 16.8±0.9a 20.8±0.6f 18.0±0.6a 16.5±0.9a 16.7±1.5a <0.001

Values are mean±SEM.

Lo=optimal muscle length, CSA=physiological cross sectional area, Po=maximal isometric tetanic force. ΔPo=change in Po after eccentric contractions. n≥4 for each line. Statistics were performed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc t-test analyses with P<0.05 considered significant.

a

Significantly different from C57BL/10.

b

Significantly different from mdx.

c

Significantly different from DysΔH2-R15-mdx.

d

Significantly different from DysΔH2-R19/ΔCT-mdx.

e

Significantly different from flµDys-mdx.

f

Significantly different from DysΔR2–15/ΔR18–23/ΔCT-mdx.

g

Significantly different from Dp116-mdx.