Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 4.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jun 19;128(9):1774–1809. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001

Table 7.

Summary of studies of TES (tDCS, tACS) in older adults.

N Mean age/age range (years) Active electrode position; size (cm) Reference electrode position; size (cm) Current (mA) Duration (min); # of sessionsa AEsb References
tDCS
25 63.7/56–80 L or R DLPFC (F3/4) (A); 35 cm2 Contralateral cheek (C); 35 cm2 1.5 10 N/R (Berryhill and Jones, 2012)
28 68.4/50–85 L and R DLPFC (F3/4) (A or C); 35 cm2 2 15 None/slight itching during the first 30 s of stimulation (Boggio et al., 2010)
32 67.9 L or R DLPFC or parietal (A); 35 cm2 Contralateral supraorbital (C); 35 cm2 1.5 6 None (Brambilla et al., 2015)
23 51–69 L M1 (A); 45 cm2 R supraorbital (C) 2 20; 5x N/R (Dumel et al., 2016)
20 66.5/61–83 L DLPFC (A); 35 cm2 R shoulder (C) 2 10 Itchiness (26/21%), burning (21/37%), heat (5/0%), pinching (74/68%), iron taste (11/11%), effect on performance (5/5%)1,2B (Fertonani et al., 2014)
20 62.1/50–80 R temporo-parietal (A); 35 cm2 L supraorbital (C); 100 cm2 1 20 N/R (Floel et al., 2012)
20 68.3 L M1 (A); 35 cm2 R supraorbital (C); 51 cm2 1 30 N/R (Fujiyama et al., 2014)
11 63.0/55–80 Ipsi M1 (A); 25 cm2, L M1-R M1 (D) Contralateral supraorbital (C) 1 15 None (Goodwill et al., 2013)
12 66.0 Ipsi M1 (A); 25 cm2 Contralateral supraorbital (C) 1 15 N/R (Goodwill et al., 2015)
22 57.5 Ipsi cerebellum (A); 25 cm2 Ipsi buccinators muscle (C) 2 15 None
Rating2A of discomfort: sham 1.9 ± 0.1, anodal 1.5 ± 0.1; Rating2A of pain: sham 1.3 ± 0.04, anodal 1.6 ± 0.2
(Hardwick and Celnik, 2014)
98 71.0/65–86 L or R DLPFC (F3/4) (A or C); 35 cm2 Vertex (A or C) 1 37.5 Greater levels of itchiness in real compared to sham stimulation2B (Harty et al., 2014)
16 73.4/65–83 L M1 (A); 25 cm2 Contralateral supraorbital (C) 1 20 N/R (Heise et al., 2014)
36 66.6 R M1 (A); 35 cm2 Contralateral supraorbital (C); 100 cm2 1 20 Itching, tingling when current was increased Rating2A of attention (>8), fatigue (<8), discomfort (<1.5): no differences and no changes from pre to post stimulation (Hoff et al., 2015)
10 69.0/62–74 L IFG (A); 5×7 R supraorbital (C) 2 20 None/Mild tingling (Holland et al., 2011)
10 69.0/56–87 L M1 (A); 25 cm2 Contralateral supraorbital (C) 1 20 None
Rating2A of attention, fatigue, discomfort: no differences
(Hummel et al., 2010)
72 64.4/55–73 R PFC (F4) or parietal (P4) (A); 35 cm2 Contralateral cheek (C) 1.5 10; 10x N/R (Jones et al., 2015)
20 66.6/60–77 L/R parietal (P3/4) (A); 25 cm2 Contralateral supraorbital (C); 35 cm2 1 15 Slightly more burning sensation during active stimulation sessions, tingling, itching2B (Learmonth et al., 2015)
20 68.2/61–77 L M1 (C3); 5×7, L M1-R M1 (D) Right supraorbital (A); 100 cm2 1 30 None (Lindenberg et al., 2013)
32 67.9 L/R DLPFC or parietal (A); 35 cm2 Contralateral supraorbital (C) 1.5 6 Itching, irritation2B (Manenti et al., 2013)
37 61 L PFC (F3) (A); 35 cm2 Right supraorbital (C) 0.8–23 20 None2B (Manor et al., 2016)
20 68.0/60–76 L IFG (A) Right supraorbital (C); 100 cm2 1 20 None (Meinzer et al., 2013)
18 68.4/61–77 L M1 (C3) (A); 35 cm2, L M1-R M1 (D) Right supraorbital (C); 100 cm2− 1 30 None (Meinzer et al., 2014b)
30 69.0/65–75 L DLPFC (F3) (A); 35 cm2 Right supraorbital (C); 100 cm2 1 or 2 25 None (Nilsson et al., 2015)
38 63.2 L M1 or R cerebellum (A); 35 cm2 Contralateral supraorbital (M1 tDCS) or L trapezius muscle (cerebellar tDCS) (C) 2 17 N/R (Panouillères et al., 2015)
8 75.0/63–84 L M1 (A); 25 cm2 Contralateral supraorbital (C) 1 20 Mild tingling, burning (during the initial 30 s of anodal/sham) (Parikh and Cole, 2014)
40 69.7 L and R DLPFC (F3/4) (A); 25 cm2 Non-dominant arm (C) 2 30; 10x None (Park et al., 2014)
54 66.9/60–82 L M1 (A); 25 cm2 Contralateral supraorbital (C); 51 cm2 1.5 20 N/R (Puri et al., 2015)
14 65.0/55–69 L or R anterior temporal (T3/4) (A); 35 cm2 Contralateral cheek (C) 1.5 15 N/R (Ross et al., 2011)
36 67.2 L DLPFC (F3) (A); 35 cm2 R supraorbital (C) 1.5 15 Itching, irritation2B (Sandrini et al., 2014)
28 68.9 L DLPFC (F3) (A); 35 cm2 R supraorbital (C) 1.5 15 Itching, irritation at the beginning of anodal/sham stimulation2B (Sandrini et al., 2016)
20 63.0 L DLPFC (F3) (A); 35 cm2 R supraorbital (C) 2 20 None (Zhou et al., 2015)
15 68.5/55–88 L M1 (A or C); 25 cm2 R supraorbital (A or C) 1 20 N/R (Zimerman et al., 2013)
N Active electrode position; size (cm) Reference electrode position; size (cm) Current (mA), frequency Duration (min); # of sessionsa AEs/stimulation-induced sensationsb

tACS
12 L temporo-parietal (CP5); 35 cm2 R supraorbital; 100 cm2 1; 6 Hz 20 Tingling (3), itching (1), tiredness (2), loss of concentration (2)2B (Antonenko et al., 2016)
24 Parieto-occipital (Cz-Oz); 35 cm2 1.5; 8–12 Hz 20; 5x N/R (Muller et al., 2015)

A, anodal; bi, bilateral stimulation with two anodal plus two reference electrodes; C, cathodal; D, dual; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; IFG, inferior frontal cortex; Ipsi, ipsilateral to the dominant hand (mostly right-handed subjects); L, left; N/R, not reported; R, right.

1

First number reflects AEs during anodal-offline (before task) and second number reflects sensations reported for anodal-online (during task) performance. 2A/B Rating on 10-point/5-point scale (0/1 = none/low, 5/10 = strong/high).

3

Determined individually.

a

Number after semicolon indicates number of consecutive sessions.

b

Were reported, numbers in brackets represent number/percentage of participants reporting the respective AE in active stimulation condition.