Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2018 Jul;47:111–126. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2018.04.002

Fig. 9 — Fig. 9. (a). 3 label predictions with the most data distributions using 5 instances each. Each row contains the atlas picture at the first column, with the rest 5 columns as prediction instances from different individual subjects’ networks.

Fig. 9. (b). 3 label predictions with the medium data distributions using 5 instances each. Each row contains the atlas picture at the first column, with the rest 5 columns as prediction instances from different individual subjects’ networks.

Fig. 9. (c). 3 label predictions with the least data distribution using 5 instances each. Each row contains the atlas picture at the first column, with the rest 5 columns as prediction instances from different individual subjects’ networks.

Fig. 9 — Fig. 9. (a). 3 label predictions with the most data distributions using 5 instances each. Each row contains the atlas picture at the first column, with the rest 5 columns as prediction instances from different individual subjects’ networks.

Fig. 9. (b). 3 label predictions with the medium data distributions using 5 instances each. Each row contains the atlas picture at the first column, with the rest 5 columns as prediction instances from different individual subjects’ networks.

Fig. 9. (c). 3 label predictions with the least data distribution using 5 instances each. Each row contains the atlas picture at the first column, with the rest 5 columns as prediction instances from different individual subjects’ networks.