Skip to main content
. 2018 May 22;9(39):25681–25697. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25355

Table 3. Schema of significant dietary parameters on the risks of colorectal cancer (CRC) and adenomas/polyps (AP) per case-control or cohort-control study designs and ethnic subgroups.

Number of studies
(n Case/n Control)
B12 Methionine B9 (Folate) B6 B2 Multivitamin Fiber
CRC AP CRC CRC CRC CRC CRC CRC
Case/Control 8 studies (3,337/4,460)
ES = 0.07*
4 studies (2,125/2,728)
RR, high level = 1.04*
NS 10 studies (3,014/4,156)
ES: NS
3 studies (2,028/3,013)
RR, high level = 0.53****
ES = NS
9 studies (3,258/4,407)
RR, high level = 0.94**
3 studies (3,075/4,137)
RR, high level = 0.96**
ES:NS 7 studies (5,564/7,417)
ES = −0.09*
Subgroups
R ES:NS 2 studies (751/979)
ES = 0.14**
Caucasian
ES:NS 2 studies (751/979)
ES = 0.13**
CR ES:NS ES:NS ES = NS ES:NS
European ES:NS ES:NS
RR:NS
Caucasian 6 studies (2,998/3,965)
ES = 0.07*
3 studies (2,018/2,504)
RR, high level = 1.04*
ES:NS 3 studies (2,028/3,013)
RR, high level = 0.53****
ES = NS
RR:NS
2 studies (751/979)
ES = 0.13**
4 studies
(3,197/4,200)
ES = −0.08***
East Asian 3 studies (1,150/1,651)
ES = −0.12*
3 studies (1,150/1,651)
RR, high level = 0.89**
Cohort/Control NS ES:NS
3 studies (933/1,564)
RR, high level = 0.92*
ES:NS 7 studies (1,791/3,593)
RR, low level = 1.13*
Subgroups
European ES:NS ES:NS
RR:NS
2 studies (178/178)
ES = −0.17*
Caucasian 4 studies (3,790/135,100)
ES = −0.86**
3 studies (933/1,564)
RR, high level = 0.92*
6 studies (1,503/3,018)
RR, high level = 0.81*
East Asian 2 studies (361/918)
ES = 0.15*
ES:NS
RR:NS

Notes: ES: Effect size; RR: Risk ratio; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; NS: Not significant; --: No data; Blue font denotes relative risk (RR) related parameters.