Table 3.
PD vs. PSP | PD vs. HC | PSP vs. HC | CI vs. CN | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Variables retained in the model |
COPZ1 PTPN1 |
COPZ1 PTPN1 |
COPZ1 PTPN1 FAXDC2 SLC14A1s NAMPT |
COPZ1 PTPN1 FAXDC2 EFTUD2 MLST8 Age |
Variables removed from the model |
EFTUD2 FAXDC2 SLC14A1s NAMPT PTBP1 MLST8 COPS7A Age Sex |
EFTUD2 FAXDC2 SLC14A1s NAMPT PTBP1 MLST8 COPS7A Age Sex |
EFTUD2 PTBP1 MLST8 COPS7A Age Sex |
SLC14A1s NAMPT PTBP1 COPS7A Sex |
Overall diagnostic accuracy (%) | 62.5% | 58% | 69% | 65.9% |
A forward step-wise linear discriminant analysis was performed to identify the best group of variables for discriminating between groups. CI, cognitively impaired; CN, cognitively normal; HC, healthy controls; PSP, progressive supranuclear palsy; PD, Parkinson’s disease.