Skip to main content
. 2018 May 29;12:363. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00363

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics.

Author, year G type N patients Age (years) Mean ± SD Sex M/F (%) Clinical characteristics
G H G H G H
Bogorodzki et al., 2014 POAG 14 12 76 ± 7.5 66.5 ± 9.8 57/43 25/75 Advanced unilateral POAG (no light perception to hand movement, CDR 0.9–1), fellow eye affected less than MD > −20 dB
Bolacchi et al., 2012 POAG 24 15 59 (M) 55 (F) 62 (M) 60 (F) 79/21 80/20 POAG patients are divided in early (stage 1 and 2 of Hodapp classification) and severe (stage 4 and 5) stage
Borges et al., 2015 POAG 9 4 70 ± 8.7 59 ± 8.2 89/11 75/25 Unilateral POAG (at least MD < −10 dB, paracentral scotoma of diameter > 10° within the central 20°) for at least 3 yrs
Boucard et al., 2007 POAG 7 12 73 62 86/14 67/33 Homonymous scotoma > 10° for at least 3 yrs. A group of 7 patients with AMD was also considered
Boucard et al., 2009 POAG 8 12 72 66 88/12 75/25 Homonymous scotoma > 10° for at least 3 yrs. A group of 9 patients with AMD was also considered
Boucard et al., 2016 NTG 30 21 52 ± 10.7 52.3 ± 15.3 77/23 48/52 In glaucomatous eyes, mean MD RE = −8.9 dB, LE = −6.8 dB
Cai et al., 2015 PACG 23 23 49.5 ± 14.4 48.2 ± 9.4 35/65 35/65 PACG eyes mean IOP = 39 mmHg. All patients underwent glaucoma surgery. 9/23 underwent MRI after surgery
Chen Z. et al., 2013 POAG 25 24 34.5 33.6 76/24 75/25 POAG subjects were divided on the basis of visual field severity in 6 groups
Chen W. W. et al., 2013 POAG 15 15 43.3 ± 4.1 43.9 ± 3.8 60/30 60/30 Bilateral advanced POAG (CDR > 0.9, MD < −15 dB).
Chen et al., 2017 PACG 20 20 54.4 ± 9.5 53.8 ± 9.2 50/50 50/50 NS
Dai et al., 2013 POAG 22 22 25 36 77/23 77/23 NS
Duncan et al., 2007a POAG 6* 0 69.3 ± 7.7 NA 50/50 NA Asymmetric POAG with one glaucomatous eye and a less affected controlateral eye
Duncan et al., 2007b POAG 6* 0 69.3 ± 7.7 NA 50/50 NA Asymmetric POAG with one glaucomatous eye and a less affected controlateral eye
El-Rafei et al., 2011 POAG—NTG 13 (7 POAG, 6 NTG) 10 64.7 ± 11.5 62.8 ± 13.6 46/54 30/70 NS
El-Rafei et al., 2013 POAG—NTG 57 (39 POAG, 18 NTG) 27 61.9 ± 8.6 58.5 ± 10.1 44/56 37/63 NS
Engelhorn et al., 2011 POAG 50 50 52.2 ± 12.6 (M) 60.0 ± 16.9 (F) 54.0 ± 14.2 (M) 61.4 ± 15.1 (F) 36/46 44/56 NS
Frezzotti et al., 2014 POAG 13 12 51.7 ± 6.6 47.3 ± 5.1 77/23 33/64 All patients had bilateral advanced glaucomatous visual field damage according with the Hodapp/Bascom Palmer classification (mean MD worse eye = −23.2 dB)
Frezzotti et al., 2016 POAG 57 29 62.1 ± 69.3 58 ± 10 67/23 52/48 POAG patients were classified according to the Hodapp/Bascom Palmer classification. 14 patients had early (Stage1), 13 moderate (Stage 2), and 30 severe (Stage 3) disease
Garaci et al., 2009 POAG 16 10 63 61 56/44 60/40 The glaucomatous eyes were stratified according to severity of visual field defects into six groups by using the Hodapp-Parrish system
Gerente et al., 2015 POAG 17 8 61.8 ± 10.9 56.4 ± 13.9 41/59 63/37 The patients were assigned to three subgroups: (Tham et al., 2014) initial glaucoma, (2) asymmetrical glaucoma and (3) severe glaucoma, according to the VF defect pattern in both eyes.
Giorgio et al., 2018 POAG—NTG 34 (17 POAG, 17 NTG) 29 58.6 ± 13.4(POAG) 58.9 ± 13.7(NTG) 57.9 ± 9.9 76/24 (NTG) 53/47 (POAG) 52/48 Glaucoma patients were classified with Hodapp/Bascom Palmer glaucoma severity Staging. Mild/moderate/severe = 10/2/5 in both POAG and NTG.
Hernowo et al., 2011 POAG 8 12 72 67 88/12 75/25 Participant inclusion criteria were the following: (1) a glaucomatous VF defect of at least 10° in diameter in at least one quadrant, affecting both eyes; (2) VF defects had to include the paracentral regions in both eyes; (3) the defects had to have been present for at least 3 years
Huang et al., 2015 PACG 21 21 52 ± 13.8 60.6 ± 4.6 38/62 43/57 NS
Jiang et al., 2017 POAG 13 13 32.4 ± 6.2 30.4 ± 4.8 77/23 77/23 Only early and mid-stage were included (stage 1, 2 and 3 of the Glaucoma Staging System 2)
Kaushik et al., 2014 POAG 9 9 69 68 44/56 33/67 Glaucoma patients with binocular, symmetrical superior, or inferior visual hemifield defects were selected. The difference between the unaffected and affected hemifield sensitivity (in decibels) had to be more than 3:1.
Lestak et al., 2014 POAG—NTG 16 (8 POAG, 8 NTG) 8 Range 40–73 (POAG) 40–70 (NTG) 23-65 63/27 25/75 NS
Li et al., 2012 POAG 30 30 50 NS 80/20 80/20 According to Becker visual field stages POAG patients were divided into 9 early stage and 21 advanced-late stage.
Li et al., 2014 POAG 21 22 46.4 ± 16.4 45.6 ± 11.9 48/52 50/50 NS
Li et al., 2017 PACG 25 25 52 52 40/60 40/60 PACG eyes mean IOP = 31 mmHg. All patients underwent glaucoma surgery. 19/25 underwent MRI after surgery
Lu et al., 2013 POAG 15 15 48 ± 20 48 ± 19 93/7 93/7 NS
Michelson et al., 2013 POAG-NTG 26 (13 POAG, 13 NTG) 7 57.4 ± 12.7 (POAG) 59.5 ± 13.1 (NTG) 54.6 ± 12.1 46/54 (POAG) 38/62 (NTG) 43/57 Glaucoma severity were assessed with HRT
Murai et al., 2015 POAG 32 19 59.5 ± 13.7 56.5 ± 14 53/47 63/37 Average MD −7.17 dB in the right eye and −8.26 dB in the left eye.
Murphy et al., 2016 POAG 26 (13 early−13 advanced) 9 62.4 ± 2.1 (early) 63.6 ± 2.3 (advanced) 61.3 ± 3.1 54/46 (early) 39/61 (advanced) 33/67 NS
Nucci et al., 2012 POAG 24 12 60 NS 70/30 NS NS
Omodaka et al., 2014 POAG 19 0 66.1 ± 9.0 NA 68/32 NA 16 eyes were POAG and 22 were NTG
Qing et al., 2010 POAG 6 0 49.5 NA 33/67 NA Asymmetric visual field damage and spared central vision.
Schoemann et al., 2014 POAG 39 22 63.9 ± 9.3 63.3 ± 11.9 33/67 41/59 NS
Sidek et al., 2014 POAG 60 (30 mild, 30 severe) 30 68.4 ± 8.9 (mild) 65.6 ± 9.0 (severe) 63.5 ± 8.4 37/67 (mild) 73/27 (severe) 40/60 The categorisation into mild and severe glaucoma was done using the Hodapp–Parrish–Anderson (HPA) classification.
Song et al., 2012 PACG 30 16 61 ± 8 L stimulation 61 ± 8 (R stimulation) 57 ± 8 37/63 38/62 The patients were assigned to the early VF defect group (paracentral scotoma, nasal ladder) or the advanced VF defect group (quadrantanopia, central visual field and temporal island).
Song et al., 2014 POAG 39 41 34.8 ± 9.9 34.8 ± 9.7 82/18 81/19 NS
Tellouck et al., 2016 POAG 50 50 61.9 ± 6.9 61.9 ± 7.0 40/60 40/60 Severity of glaucoma was defined on Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson classification
Wang et al., 2013 PACG 23 20 54 50 39/61 35/65 Severity of glaucoma was defined on Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson classification
Wang et al., 2016 POAG 25 25 44.6 ± 13.0 36.8 ± 11.6 44/56 52/48 NS
Wang et al., 2016a POAG 25 25 44.6 ± 13.0 36.8 ± 11.6 44/56 52/48 NS
Wang et al., 2016b POAG 25 25 44.6 ± 13.0 36.8 ± 11.6 44/56 52/48 NS
Williams et al., 2013 POAG 15 15 66.1 ± 11.2 65.6 ± 11.3 67/33 67/33 NS
Yu et al., 2013 POAG 36 40 46.5 46.5 75/25 74/26 Two subgroups (a mild and severe group) based on Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson classification
Yu et al., 2014 POAG 36 (19 + 17) 20 42.6 ± 14.5 (mild) 48.1 ± 16.6 (severe) 43.3 ± 15.1 57/43 (mild) 71/29 (severe) 55/45 19 mild and 17 severe POAG patients based on Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson classification
Yu et al., 2015 POAG 37 (20 + 17) 20 43.6 ± 14.5 (mild) 48.1 ± 16.6 (severe) 43.3 ± 15.1 59/41 (mild) 71/29 (severe) 55/45 20 mild and 17 severe POAG patients based on Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson classification
Zhang et al., 2012 NTG 30 30 54.8 ± 11.9 53.9 ± 11.2 50/50 53/47 NS
Zhang et al., 2013 POAG-PACG 20 20 45 45 40/60 40/60 8 POAG, 12 PACG. Different stages (from early to advanced)
Zhang et al., 2015 POAG 23 29 47 ± 7 48 ± 7 61/39 66/36 9 early-moderate glaucoma and 14 advanced glaucoma
Zhang et al., 2016 POAG—NTG 18 (10 + 8) 18 33.0 ± 5.6 33.0 ± 5.6 78/22 78/22 10 POAG, 8 NTG all early stage
Zhou et al., 2017a POAG 11 11 60.0 ± 9.2 55.9 ± 7.5 36/64 64/34 Mild to moderate POAG
Zhou et al., 2017b POAG 9 9 61 ± 11 58 ± 5 44/56 67/33 NS
Zikou et al., 2012 POAG 18 18 57.1 ± 11.4 NS 78/22 NS NS
*

Duncan et al. (2007a) and Duncan et al. (2007b) share the same patients, G, glaucoma; H, healthy; CDR, Cup/disc ratio; yrs, years; NR, not reported; MD, Mean Deviation; RE, right eye; LE, left eye; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; NS, not specified; NA, not applicable; VF, visual field; HRT, Heidelberg Retina tomograph.